Request for Comments: Scalar Type Hinting With Casts
- Version: 0.1.9.1
- Date: 2012-07-03 (reopened 2014-07-13, latest update 2014-09-14, withdrawn 2014-09-15)
- Author: Anthony Ferrara ircmaxell@php.net (original)
- Contributors: Andrea Faulds ajf@ajf.me (current maintainer)
- Status: Withdrawn (previously Withdrawn then reopened)
- First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/scalar_type_hinting_with_cast
Introduction
Currently, PHP has no way to provide type hinting for function parameters which are not classes or arrays. This is on often requested feature that has been discussed on the internals list many many times. This RFC discusses a new implementation of this feature that attempts to stay close to php's type shifting roots, and attempts to mirror zend_parse_parameters as much as possible.
Philosophy
This RFC discusses a method of adding scalar type hints to PHP while attempting to embrace the dynamic nature of PHP variables. This means that passing a type that does not exactly match the hinted type will cause a cast to happen. This cast will only succeed if the argument can be cleanly converted to the requested type. If it cannot be converted without significant data-loss, an E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR will be raised.
For consistency, this patch attempts to largely follow zend_parse_parameters() for the validation rules, but disallows lossy conversion from float to int (1.5 -> int generates an error) and non-well-formed numeric values for float or int ('123abc' is an error). Since v0.1.6, booleans are handled strictly, and since v0.1.9, booleans are not accepted for int, float, numeric and string, also departures from zpp
Rationale for this proposal compared to others
Other options for scalar type hints have been proposed. The most obvious other two are strict type hinting, where no casting is done and if the value is the wrong type, it errors (much like the non-scalar type hints), and type casting, where values are simply casted using the implicit casting rules with no failure cases (but sometimes emitting notices).
The problems with strict type hinting are twofold. Firstly, PHP's types can change somewhat unpredictably. For example, dividing one integer by another may result in a float when the the divisor is not a factor, and existing code may be poorly written and not guaranteed to return the types you'd expect. Secondly, while PHP's non-scalar types have always been quite strict and not been juggled, PHP's scalar types are routinely casted implictly, juggled, and are expected to do so, because of PHP's designed-for-the-web nature where numeric values are likely to start life in string form (from $_GET etc.). To break from this convention would be rather “un-PHP-like”; PHP has always juggled its scalar types, and PHP's internal (zend_parse_parameters-using, at least) functions have always had implict casting.
The other main option, simply type casting, also has problems. This way, there is no real error prevention (E_NOTICE is not a safeguard, it is a message in a log file, and in production it is not even that) and unsafe casts can happen with data being lost. Being able to pass “foobar” as an argument which is expected to be an integer doesn't really make sense and would probably be a source of problems. It's also not actually consistent, despite what it first appears, with the behaviour of zend_parse_parameters for internal functions; zend_parse_parameters actually fails in many cases, and a lot of internal functions will bail out and return NULL when it does.
On the other hand, this RFC tries to strike a balance between strict typing and mere type casting. It casts, making sure PHP's type shifting won't break things and keeping with PHP's traditional type casting and juggling nature, which is useful when dealing with the web, but prevents conversions causing data loss, reducing the likelihood of causing bugs and making it more likely bugs will be caught. In this way we feel the RFC combines the best parts of both proposals, providing both validation and type conversion.
Proposal
Engine Changes
The current implementation introduces five new reserved words: int, float, bool, string and numeric. These were not previously reserved, because casting is a special case in the lexer.
If this causes a problem, it would be possible to revert to the previous implementation, where the parser still detects the type hints as object type hints and the compiler (zend_compile.c) then detects the exact value for the type hint, changing the stored hint from IS_OBJECT to the proper type (freeing the string).
Syntax
Five new type hints are introduced with this patch:
- int - Matching integers only
- float - Matching floating point numbers
- numeric - Matching integers and floating point numbers (to allow polymorphic functions dealing with numbers)
- bool - Matching boolean parameters only
- string - Matching strings only
Conversion Rules
Conversion is allowed only if data-loss does not happen. There are a few exceptions (objects using __toString, etc.). Here's a table of examples.
- fail indicates an E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR
- pass indicates no error and a conversion
- notice indicates an E_NOTICE and a conversion
value | string | float | int | numeric | boolean‡ | array |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
true (boolean) | fail | fail | fail | fail | pass | fail |
false (boolean) | fail | fail | fail | fail | pass | fail |
NULL (NULL) | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail |
0 (integer) | pass | pass | pass | pass | fail | fail |
1 (integer) | pass | pass | pass | pass | fail | fail |
12 (integer) | pass | pass | pass | pass | fail | fail |
12 (double) | pass | pass | pass | pass | fail | fail |
12.34 (double) | pass | pass | fail | pass | fail | fail |
'true' (string) | pass | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail |
'false' (string) | pass | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail |
'0' (string) | pass | pass | pass | pass | fail | fail |
'1' (string) | pass | pass | pass | pass | fail | fail |
'12' (string) | pass | pass | pass | pass | fail | fail |
'12abc' (string) | pass | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail |
'12.0' (string) | pass | pass | pass | pass | fail | fail |
'12.34' (string) | pass | pass | fail | pass | fail | fail |
'foo' (string) | pass | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail |
array () (array) | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail | pass |
array (0 => 12) (array) | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail | pass |
'' (string) | pass | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail |
1 (resource) | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail | fail |
StdClass | fail | fail* | fail* | fail* | fail† | fail |
implementing __toString | pass | fail* | fail* | fail* | fail† | fail |
*actually notice in patch as it stands due to behaviour of default object casting handler
†actually pass in patch as it stands due to behaviour of default object casting handler
‡likely subject to change, see Booleans section below
It's important to note that passing `12.5` as a float or string to a int type hint will presently fail, since data-loss would occur (this diverges from zend_parse_parameters which would truncate the value).
Errors
If a provided hint does not match at all (“foo” passed to an int hint), an E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is raised. This includes non-well-formed numerics passed to an int, float or numeric hinted parameter, unlike zend_parse_parameters which would simply raise an E_NOTICE.
Defaults
Any value can be entered as a default. Presently even array() is allowable for an int type hint. The default is converted at run-time when it is accessed.
This can lead to odd bugs, so in the future it would be good to validate the default in zend_compile.c (casting it where appropriate, checking for a valid cast).
NULL defaults (nullable hints)
The scalar types can be nullable just like any other type. If a parameter does not have a default value of NULL, then NULL is not a permitted value. If it does have a default value of NULL, and is therefore nullable, then the value NULL is accepted and will not be casted.
References
The current implementation treats references like any other value. If it casts, the referenced value is casted.
New APIs
This current proposal adds a series of conversion functions to the core:
- int convert_to_{type}_safe(zval **ptr) - Convert the zval to {type}. Return value indicates if conversion was “clean”. (FAILURE indicates unclean conversion)
- int convert_to_{type}_safe_ex(zval **ptr) - Separate zval if not a reference, and convert to {type}. Return indicates clean conversion (FAILURE indicates unclean conversion).
These functions pairs exist for long, double, string, boolean and numeric.
New Methods
For consistency, the following new methods have been added to ReflectionParameter
- isInt() - boolean to determine if parameter is type-hinted as an integer.
- isFloat() - boolean to determine if parameter is type-hinted as a float.
- isBool() - boolean to determine if parameter is type-hinted as a boolean.
- isString() - boolean to determine if parameter is type-hinted as a string.
- isNumeric() - boolean to determine if parameter is type-hinted as numeric.
Patch
The modifications necessary to implement this feature exist on the scalar_type_hints branch of Andrea's GitHub fork (forked from the branch on ircmaxell's GitHub fork). It is stable to the best of Andrea's knowledge, with its tests passing and it breaking no known tests on her machine nor Travis.
Possible Changes
For points I'm unsure on, this section lists possible future changes to the RFC.
Float to Int Casting Rules
At present, the cast from float to int results in an error if the int doesn't exactly represent the float (satisfying a double cast: val = (double) (long) val). And a cast from an int to a float follows the same semantics (as on 64 bit platforms PHP_INT_MAX is not exactly representable by a float).
This could be relaxed for semi-representable values. So 1.5 could be allowed for an int parameter (casted to 1). But float(99999999999999999999) would not, because it would lose a lot of information in the transfer (would be casted to PHP_INT_MAX).
I believe the current behavior (error on non-exactly-representable) is the correct one. However, this could be changed to an E_NOTICE instead indicating that partial data was lost.
Warning On Data Loss
We could also change the E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR on data-loss to an E_WARNING. That would allow data-loss to continue. The value passed in would still be cast according to the normal casting rules. So passing “foo” to an int parameter would result in int(1) and an E_WARNING.
Handling of StdClass and other objects
While an E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR result when passing a StdClass (and other objects with the default object handlers) to parameters hinted as int, float or bool would be desirable, the patch as it stands does not do this. Instead, for the int and float cases, an E_NOTICE is emitted and the result back is 1, and in the bool case, no error at all happens and the result back is true. To make this yield E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR would require detecting the default object handler (an ugly hack which also wouldn't make the behaviour sensible for non-defaults), or changing the behaviour and/or semantics of the object handler for casting, neither of which are particularly desirable. By keeping the current behaviour in the patch, we are consistent with casting and zend_parse_parameters. Furthermore, it could be argued that since objects are truthy, casting to bool without complaint here might not be a bad thing.
Booleans
Given that StdClass casts without error to bool in the patch as it stands, and there's no nice way of changing that (see previous section), should we just make all truthy values (including array(non-empty) and resource) cast to true without error, and all falsey values (including array() and empty string) cast to false without error?
While int, float and string only allow lossless casting (with the exception of objects), bool’s behaviour at the moment is quite different. The current behaviour leaves much to be desired, and there are some other options available.
One option is simply to forget about being lossless and make the bool type hint accept any value, meaning any truthy value or any falsey value would yield what is expected without error. This would ensure that if someone has passed in a non-boolean truthy/falsey value to your function, it’ll be handled correctly. It would mean all your bit hacks ($foo & FLAG etc.) would work and anything you got from $_GET (e.g. ?foobar=1). However, this is unlikely to catch bugs in code, because literally any PHP value would work. For that reason, this may not be the way forward.
Another option is go completely strict and allow only boolean values, failing everything else, which is what the RFC current proposes since v0.1.6. This would be unlike the int, float and string hints, which are flexible and cast, but would be more helpful for catching bugs. It's worth noting that unlike for numbers, which can be losslessly transformed between string, int and float without any information lost at all, a string value casted to a boolean then back to a string will not be the same as the original string value. There aren't any sensible completely lossless bidirectional casts for booleans where the result of casting from boolean would obviously be boolean. However, not casting at all isn’t very “PHP-like”, and forcing people to manually cast with (bool) might not be ideal. If we were to go for this one, we could also accept objects casting to bool (which the default handler does), because otherwise we'd be stopping extension developers from making bool-like objects if they so pleased.
The final option this section considers is a limited set of values. TRUE, FALSE and NULL would be accepted, along with the integer and float values 1 and 0 (which are the int/float values TRUE and FALSE cast to, respectively), ‘1’ and the empty string (which are the string values TRUE and FALSE cast to), and ‘0’ (which (string)(int)FALSE would give you), along with objects casting to boolean. This is something of a compromise between the first two proposals.
Both the author of this RFC (Anthony) and the current maintainer (Andrea) are yet to settle on one specific option.
Handling of "123abc" for int, float and numeric
This has been changed to E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR, but should it perhaps be something softer, like E_NOTICE or E_WARNING?
With it as E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR, it can be considered to “fail” the typehint and hence the int and float typehints are lossless.
Examples
Note that these reflect the intended output and not what the patch at present actually does. For that, see the patch's own test cases or the table above.
Integer Hints
- int_hint.php
<?php function foo(int $a) { var_dump($a); } foo(1); // int(1) foo("1"); // int(1) foo(1.0); // int(1) foo("1a"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo("a"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(""); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(999999999999999999999999999999999999); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR (since it's not exactly representable by an int) foo('999999999999999999999999999999999999'); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR (since it's not exactly representable by an int) foo(1.5); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(array()); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(new StdClass); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR ?>
Float Hints
- float_hint.php
<?php function foo(float $a) { var_dump($a); } foo(1); // float(1) foo("1"); // float(1) foo(1.0); // float(1) foo("1a"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo("a"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(""); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(1.5); // float(1.5) foo(array()); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(new StdClass); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR ?>
Numeric Hints
- numeric_hint.php
<?php function foo(numeric $a) { var_dump($a); } foo(1); // int(1) foo("1"); // int(1) foo(1.0); // float(1) foo("1a"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo("a"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(""); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(1.5); // float(1.5) foo(array()); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(new StdClass); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR ?>
String Hints
- string_hint.php
<?php function foo(string $a) { var_dump($a); } foo(1); // string "1" foo("1"); // string "1" foo(1.0); // string "1" foo("1a"); // string "1a" foo("a"); // string "a" foo(""); // string "" foo(1.5); // string "1.5" foo(array()); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(new StdClass); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR ?>
Boolean Hints
- bool_hint.php
<?php function foo(bool $a) { var_dump($a); } foo(1); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo("1"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(1.0); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(0); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo("0"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo("1a"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo("a"); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(""); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(1.5); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(array()); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(new StdClass); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR foo(true); // bool(true) foo(false); // bool(false) foo(null); // E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR ?>
Proposed Voting Choices
As this is a language change, a 2/3 majority is required. Voting started 2014-09-14 and ends 2014-09-21.
It will be a straight Yes/No vote.
More Information
Prior RFCs
- Return value and parameter type hint by Felipe
- Strict and weak parameter type checking by Lukas and Zeev
- Optional Strict Type Checking for Scalars by Paul (Ilia's proposal)
- Parser and Reflection-API only Type Hints by Derick (Implemented)
- Parameter Type Casting Hints by Anthony
Changelog
- 0.1 - Initial Draft
- 0.1.1 - Takeover by Andrea; notes on StdClass behaviour
- 0.1.2 - Renamed boolean to bool, noted reserved words
- 0.1.3 - E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR for “1a” as int/float
- 0.1.4 - Removed resource typehint
- 0.1.5 - Note on NULL default values
- 0.1.6 - Booleans are now strict
- 0.1.7 - Types are now not nullable by default
- 0.1.8 - Added numeric typehint
- 0.1.8.1 - Overflow prevention for int hints
- 0.1.9 - Booleans not accepted for int, float, numeric or string
- 0.1.9.1 - Added “” to tests, patch is stable