rfc:php6
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
rfc:php6 [2014/07/22 14:14] – More minor changes. zeev | rfc:php6 [2014/07/22 14:17] – zeev | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* Skipping versions isn't unprecedented or uncommon in both open source projects and commercial products. | * Skipping versions isn't unprecedented or uncommon in both open source projects and commercial products. | ||
* Version 6 is generally associated with failure in the world of dynamic languages. | * Version 6 is generally associated with failure in the world of dynamic languages. | ||
- | |||
- | To summarize, version 6 is already taken by a highly publicized project that is in the minds of a very large chunk of PHP developers, internals and general PHP community alike. | ||
- | The proposal to reuse it for something completely different **will gain us absolutely nothing**, unless our goal is to needlessly confuse our users. | ||
As a special non serious bonus, 7 is perceived as a lucky number in both the Western world and Chinese culture. | As a special non serious bonus, 7 is perceived as a lucky number in both the Western world and Chinese culture. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Summary ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Version 6 is already taken by a highly publicized project that is in the minds of a very large chunk of PHP developers, internals and general PHP community alike. | ||
+ | Insisting on reusing it for a completely different project **will gain us absolutely nothing**, unless our goal is to needlessly confuse our users. | ||
+ | |||
===== The Case for PHP 6 ===== | ===== The Case for PHP 6 ===== |
rfc/php6.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1