rfc:namedparameters

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:namedparameters [2012/04/14 03:55] – [Introduction] sixdrfc:namedparameters [2012/04/14 04:00] – Clarify that this RFC is incomplete - and that someone else needs to own it sixd
Line 2: Line 2:
   * Version: 0.1   * Version: 0.1
   * Date: 2012-04-13   * Date: 2012-04-13
-  * Author:  +  * Author: Needs an owner & champion else this project will not be considered 
-  * Status: Draft+  * Status: Draft - no content except a very old decision on the topic
   * First Published at: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namedparameters   * First Published at: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namedparameters
  
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 Named Parameters is a topic that has been raised many times over the years.  The pros and cons Named Parameters is a topic that has been raised many times over the years.  The pros and cons
-are captured in a variety of emails.  Now PHP has an RFC process the discussion should be recorded in an RFC (this is yet to be done).+are captured in a variety of emails and (obviously) the feature has not gained support and is not implemented.   
 + 
 +Since the topic continually gets re-raised, and now PHP has an RFC processthe discussion should be recorded in an RFC (**Note this is yet to be done**so the same arguments don't have to be revisited.
  
 ===== Paris Meeting 2005 ===== ===== Paris Meeting 2005 =====
Line 39: Line 41:
  
 We do not want to add it. We do not want to add it.
 +
 +===== Current Discussion =====
 +
 +**All the pros & cons raised since 2005 need to be extracted from the mail archives and added here.**
 +
rfc/namedparameters.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1