rfc:coercive_sth

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
rfc:coercive_sth [2015/03/11 14:33]
zeev Mention forward compatibility on internal function calls
rfc:coercive_sth [2015/03/11 15:01]
zeev Add voting period.
Line 177: Line 177:
   * **Static Analysis** - Analyzing code without running it, attempting to derive conclusions about security, performance,​ etc.   * **Static Analysis** - Analyzing code without running it, attempting to derive conclusions about security, performance,​ etc.
  
-===== Proposed Voting Choices ​===== +===== Vote ===== 
-The voting choices ​would be yes/no.+The voting choices ​are yes (in favor for accepting this RFC for PHP 7) or no (against it).
 The RFC proposes a very substantial change to PHP's coercion rules, which may evolve to affect implicit typing in the future. The RFC proposes a very substantial change to PHP's coercion rules, which may evolve to affect implicit typing in the future.
-It absolutely requires a 2/3 majority, with the hope of reaching as close as possible to consensus.+It absolutely requires a 2/3 majority, with the hope of reaching as close as possible to consensus. ​ The vote starts on March 11th, and will end two weeks later, on March 25th. 
 + 
 +<doodle title="​coercive_sth"​ auth="​zeev"​ voteType="​single"​ closed="​false">​ 
 +   * Yes 
 +   * No 
 +</​doodle>​
  
 ===== Patches and Tests ===== ===== Patches and Tests =====
 https://​github.com/​php/​php-src/​pull/​1125/​files https://​github.com/​php/​php-src/​pull/​1125/​files
rfc/coercive_sth.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)