rfc:class-naming

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:class-naming [2017/07/01 17:44]
fleshgrinder Added visual gap between the polls
rfc:class-naming [2017/09/22 13:28] (current)
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2017-06-03   * Date: 2017-06-03
   * Author: Richard Fussenegger,​ php@fleshgrinder.com   * Author: Richard Fussenegger,​ php@fleshgrinder.com
-  * Status: ​Voting+  * Status: ​Accepted
   * First Published at: http://​wiki.php.net/​rfc/​class-naming   * First Published at: http://​wiki.php.net/​rfc/​class-naming
  
Line 100: Line 100:
 Simple 50%+1 majority vote: Simple 50%+1 majority vote:
  
-<doodle title="​Should we update the coding standard?"​ auth="​fleshgrinder"​ voteType="​single"​ closed="​false">+<doodle title="​Should we update the coding standard?"​ auth="​fleshgrinder"​ voteType="​single"​ closed="​true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 107: Line 107:
 \\ \\
  
-<doodle title="​What class naming style should we use?" auth="​fleshgrinder"​ voteType="​single"​ closed="​false">+<doodle title="​What class naming style should we use?" auth="​fleshgrinder"​ voteType="​single"​ closed="​true">
    * PascalCase except Acronyms    * PascalCase except Acronyms
    * Always PascalCase    * Always PascalCase
rfc/class-naming.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)