rfc:voting
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
rfc:voting [2013/12/30 17:31] – Switched to gender neutral pronouns. davey | rfc:voting [2019/02/22 12:20] – Add explicit note that this RFC has been amended nikic | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Request for Comments: Voting on PHP features ====== | ====== Request for Comments: Voting on PHP features ====== | ||
- | * Version: 1.0 | + | * Version: 1.1 |
- | * Date: 2011-06-05 | + | * Date: 2019-02-22 |
* Author: Zeev Suraski, Pierre Joye, David Soria Parra | * Author: Zeev Suraski, Pierre Joye, David Soria Parra | ||
* Status: Accepted, [[rfc: | * Status: Accepted, [[rfc: | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
===== Discussion period ===== | ===== Discussion period ===== | ||
- | There' | + | There' |
This does not preclude discussion on the merits on any idea or proposal on the list without formally submitting it as a proposal, but the discussion time is measured only since the formal discussion announcement as described above. | This does not preclude discussion on the merits on any idea or proposal on the list without formally submitting it as a proposal, but the discussion time is measured only since the formal discussion announcement as described above. | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
===== Required Majority ===== | ===== Required Majority ===== | ||
- | Given that changes to languages (as opposed to changes to apps or even frameworks) are for the most part irreversible | + | **Note:** This section has been amended by the [[rfc: |
+ | |||
+ | The primary vote of an RFC, determining overall acceptance | ||
+ | |||
+ | Additionally, | ||
+ | |||
+ | For procedural | ||
Line 43: | Line 49: | ||
In order to save valuable time, it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another vote, unless one of the following happens: | In order to save valuable time, it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another vote, unless one of the following happens: | ||
* 6 months pass from the time of the previous vote, OR | * 6 months pass from the time of the previous vote, OR | ||
- | * The author(s) make substantial changes to the proposal. | + | * The author(s) make substantial changes to the proposal. |
Line 51: | Line 57: | ||
The proposal here is for two audiences to participate in the voting process: | The proposal here is for two audiences to participate in the voting process: | ||
- | * People with php.net | + | * People with php.net |
- | * Representatives from the PHP community, that will be chosen by those with php.net | + | * Representatives from the PHP community, that will be chosen by those with php.net |
* Lead developers of PHP based projects (frameworks, | * Lead developers of PHP based projects (frameworks, | ||
* regular participant of internals discussions | * regular participant of internals discussions |
rfc/voting.txt · Last modified: 2019/04/22 06:53 by krakjoe