rfc:voting
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
rfc:voting [2011/06/27 22:06] – results dsp | rfc:voting [2019/02/22 11:46] – update required majority krakjoe | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Request for Comments: Voting on PHP features ====== | ====== Request for Comments: Voting on PHP features ====== | ||
- | * Version: 1.0 | + | * Version: 1.1 |
- | * Date: 2011-06-05 | + | * Date: 2019-02-22 |
* Author: Zeev Suraski, Pierre Joye, David Soria Parra | * Author: Zeev Suraski, Pierre Joye, David Soria Parra | ||
* Status: Accepted, [[rfc: | * Status: Accepted, [[rfc: | ||
* First Published at: [[http:// | * First Published at: [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Votes ===== | ||
- | |||
- | This RFC is in the voting phase, please [[rfc/ | ||
- | |||
- | Vote begins on 2011/06/20 and ends on 2011/06/27. | ||
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
Line 24: | Line 18: | ||
The proposal should be initiated by one of its authors. If the proposal is a repeated one, re-proposed by somebody else, the proposer should discuss it with the original author, if possible, and add himself to the RFC author list before proposing it. | The proposal should be initiated by one of its authors. If the proposal is a repeated one, re-proposed by somebody else, the proposer should discuss it with the original author, if possible, and add himself to the RFC author list before proposing it. | ||
- | If the proposer is not a member of php.net and thus can not create RFCs on the wiki, he should recruit one of the members for help or request membership. | + | If the proposer is not a member of php.net and thus can not create RFCs on the wiki, they should recruit one of the members for help or request membership. |
===== Discussion period ===== | ===== Discussion period ===== | ||
- | There' | + | There' |
This does not preclude discussion on the merits on any idea or proposal on the list without formally submitting it as a proposal, but the discussion time is measured only since the formal discussion announcement as described above. | This does not preclude discussion on the merits on any idea or proposal on the list without formally submitting it as a proposal, but the discussion time is measured only since the formal discussion announcement as described above. | ||
Line 34: | Line 28: | ||
===== Voting ===== | ===== Voting ===== | ||
- | The author decides when it's time to move ahead and call a vote on the RFC. If the author feels that there' | + | The author decides when it's time to move ahead and call a vote on the RFC. If the author feels that there' |
The vote is announced on the mailing list in a separate thread by sending an email with the subject **[VOTE]**. It should reference the RFCs being voted on and if there are different options discussed, explain these options. It should also contain the URL of the page where the vote is taking place. | The vote is announced on the mailing list in a separate thread by sending an email with the subject **[VOTE]**. It should reference the RFCs being voted on and if there are different options discussed, explain these options. It should also contain the URL of the page where the vote is taking place. | ||
Line 42: | Line 36: | ||
===== Required Majority ===== | ===== Required Majority ===== | ||
- | Given that changes to languages (as opposed to changes to apps or even frameworks) are for the most part irreversible - the purpose | + | The primary vote of an RFC, determining overall acceptance of the proposal, may only have two voting options and requires a 2/3 majority. This means that the number |
+ | |||
+ | Additionally, | ||
+ | |||
+ | For procedural | ||
Line 49: | Line 47: | ||
In order to save valuable time, it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another vote, unless one of the following happens: | In order to save valuable time, it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another vote, unless one of the following happens: | ||
* 6 months pass from the time of the previous vote, OR | * 6 months pass from the time of the previous vote, OR | ||
- | * The author(s) make substantial changes to the proposal. | + | * The author(s) make substantial changes to the proposal. |
===== Who can vote ===== | ===== Who can vote ===== | ||
- | There' | + | There' |
The proposal here is for two audiences to participate in the voting process: | The proposal here is for two audiences to participate in the voting process: | ||
- | * People with php.net | + | * People with php.net |
- | * Representatives from the PHP community, that will be chosen by those with php.net | + | * Representatives from the PHP community, that will be chosen by those with php.net |
* Lead developers of PHP based projects (frameworks, | * Lead developers of PHP based projects (frameworks, | ||
* regular participant of internals discussions | * regular participant of internals discussions |
rfc/voting.txt · Last modified: 2019/04/22 06:53 by krakjoe