rfc:undefined_variable_error_promotion

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
rfc:undefined_variable_error_promotion [2022/03/28 17:51] – marandallrfc:undefined_variable_error_promotion [2022/03/28 17:52] (current) – marandall
Line 135: Line 135:
 Vote opened 2022-03-14, vote closes 2022-03-28 Vote opened 2022-03-14, vote closes 2022-03-28
  
-<doodle title="Promote Undefined Variables to Throw an Error" auth="marandall" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Promote Undefined Variables to Throw an Error" auth="marandall" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 142: Line 142:
 Meta vote for reasoning of voting against: Meta vote for reasoning of voting against:
  
-<doodle title="Main reason for voting against if you did?" auth="marandall" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Main reason for voting against if you did?" auth="marandall" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Using undefined variables is a legitimate coding style    * Using undefined variables is a legitimate coding style
    * Backwards compatibility breaks    * Backwards compatibility breaks
rfc/undefined_variable_error_promotion.1648489867.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/03/28 17:51 by marandall

Page Tools