rfc:unary_null_coalescing_operator

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:unary_null_coalescing_operator [2017/07/11 21:51]
ajf
rfc:unary_null_coalescing_operator [2017/09/22 13:28] (current)
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2017-06-21   * Date: 2017-06-21
   * Author: Andrea Faulds, ajf@ajf.me   * Author: Andrea Faulds, ajf@ajf.me
-  * Status: In Voting+  * Status: Declined
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/unary_null_coalescing_operator   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/unary_null_coalescing_operator
  
Line 43: Line 43:
 ===== Backward Incompatible Changes ===== ===== Backward Incompatible Changes =====
 None. None.
 +
 +There is an ambiguity in the case where unary <php>??</php> is followed by an operator that can be either unary or binary, i.e. <php>$a?? + $b</php> and <php>$a?? - $b</php>. These continue to be parsed the same (<php>$a ?? (+$b)</php>, <php>$a ?? (-$b)</php>), meaning there is no backwards-compatibility break. 
  
 ===== Proposed PHP Version(s) ===== ===== Proposed PHP Version(s) =====
Line 60: Line 62:
 This is a simple language change which should only require a 2/3 majority vote on whether or not to approve it. This is a simple language change which should only require a 2/3 majority vote on whether or not to approve it.
  
-Voting started 2017-07-11 and ends 2017-07-18.+Voting started 2017-07-11 and <del>ends 2017-07-18</del> ended 2017-07-18.
  
-<doodle title="Accept and merge unary null coalescing operator for PHP 7.2?" auth="ajf" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Accept and merge unary null coalescing operator for PHP 7.2?" auth="ajf" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
rfc/unary_null_coalescing_operator.1499809899.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)