rfc:unary_null_coalescing_operator

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:unary_null_coalescing_operator [2017/07/11 21:51] – ajfrfc:unary_null_coalescing_operator [2017/07/19 00:28] – ajf
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2017-06-21   * Date: 2017-06-21
   * Author: Andrea Faulds, ajf@ajf.me   * Author: Andrea Faulds, ajf@ajf.me
-  * Status: In Voting+  * Status: Declined
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/unary_null_coalescing_operator   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/unary_null_coalescing_operator
  
Line 43: Line 43:
 ===== Backward Incompatible Changes ===== ===== Backward Incompatible Changes =====
 None. None.
 +
 +There is an ambiguity in the case where unary <php>??</php> is followed by an operator that can be either unary or binary, i.e. <php>$a?? + $b</php> and <php>$a?? - $b</php>. These continue to be parsed the same (<php>$a ?? (+$b)</php>, <php>$a ?? (-$b)</php>), meaning there is no backwards-compatibility break. 
  
 ===== Proposed PHP Version(s) ===== ===== Proposed PHP Version(s) =====
rfc/unary_null_coalescing_operator.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1

Page Tools