rfc:typecheckingstrictandweak
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| rfc:typecheckingstrictandweak [2010/06/08 15:48] – Added patch dmitry | rfc:typecheckingstrictandweak [2012/03/26 13:33] – [Request for Comments: Strict and weak parameter type checking] add link to discussion on internals danielc | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| * Status: In discussion | * Status: In discussion | ||
| * First Published at: http:// | * First Published at: http:// | ||
| + | * Discussion: http:// | ||
| This RFC provides a proposal for auto-converting parameter type checking for function/ | This RFC provides a proposal for auto-converting parameter type checking for function/ | ||
| Line 96: | Line 97: | ||
| The auto-conversion would follow the current type juggeling rules. However in case of a cast that leads to data loss (like casting from ' | The auto-conversion would follow the current type juggeling rules. However in case of a cast that leads to data loss (like casting from ' | ||
| - | |||
| ===== Patch ===== | ===== Patch ===== | ||
| - | * {{rfc:week_typechecking.diff.txt}} | + | * {{:rfc:auto_converting_type_hinting.diff.txt}} |
| ===== Changelog ===== | ===== Changelog ===== | ||
| * restructured to provide 3 options (two with current type juggeling rules and E_STRICT or E_FATAL on data loss conversion and one with new type juggeling rules and E_STRICT on data loss. | * restructured to provide 3 options (two with current type juggeling rules and E_STRICT or E_FATAL on data loss conversion and one with new type juggeling rules and E_STRICT on data loss. | ||
rfc/typecheckingstrictandweak.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1