rfc:structured_object_notation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| rfc:structured_object_notation [2016/07/31 08:52] – midorikocak | rfc:structured_object_notation [2016/07/31 08:53] – midorikocak | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
| Let's have one class called B, similar to above example. | Let's have one class called B, similar to above example. | ||
| - | < | + | < |
| - | Class B{ | + | class B{ |
| // No way to define order of methods | // No way to define order of methods | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
| Instead of instantiating objects on the fly, here I propose a structured definition of an object using this syntax: | Instead of instantiating objects on the fly, here I propose a structured definition of an object using this syntax: | ||
| - | < | + | < |
| Object $app instanceof B{ | Object $app instanceof B{ | ||
rfc/structured_object_notation.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1