rfc:strtolower-ascii
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Last revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| rfc:strtolower-ascii [2021/11/25 05:02] – add vote tstarling | rfc:strtolower-ascii [2021/11/25 11:22] – remove words "because they are intended for natural language processing" as suggested by Nicolas Grekas tstarling | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| ===== Future Scope ===== | ===== Future Scope ===== | ||
| - | I didn't include strnatcasecmp() and natcasesort() in this RFC, because they also use isdigit() and isspace(), and because they are intended for natural language processing. They could be migrated in future. | + | I didn't include strnatcasecmp() and natcasesort() in this RFC, because they also use isdigit() and isspace(). They could be migrated in future. |
| There are about 50 direct callers of tolower() and toupper() which I haven' | There are about 50 direct callers of tolower() and toupper() which I haven' | ||
rfc/strtolower-ascii.txt · Last modified: 2021/12/10 21:52 by tstarling