rfc:static-classes

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:static-classes [2008/05/03 15:18] – Further clarification lstrojnyrfc:static-classes [2008/05/05 20:50] – static public static!? lstrojny
Line 9: Line 9:
 Static classes are a well known construct for utility classes or stateless abstraction. C# for example has an class System.Environment to access command line options, the current directory, the name of the machine where the program is running and so on. In PHP the current practice is to use an abstract class with static methods. Static classes are a well known construct for utility classes or stateless abstraction. C# for example has an class System.Environment to access command line options, the current directory, the name of the machine where the program is running and so on. In PHP the current practice is to use an abstract class with static methods.
 Static classes can act as utility containers. For such utility containers or for more complex static inheritance, static classes are a helpful tool. This is why they are proposed for PHP. Static classes can act as utility containers. For such utility containers or for more complex static inheritance, static classes are a helpful tool. This is why they are proposed for PHP.
 +
  
 ===== Syntax ===== ===== Syntax =====
Line 21: Line 22:
 abstract static class AbstractStaticClass abstract static class AbstractStaticClass
 { {
-    abstract static public static abstractStaticMethod();+    abstract static public abstractStaticMethod();
 } }
 </code> </code>
 +
 ===== Object model rules ===== ===== Object model rules =====
 The following rules would apply for static classes: The following rules would apply for static classes:
Line 33: Line 35:
   * Static classes **may not** extend non-static classes   * Static classes **may not** extend non-static classes
   * The current behaviour of abstract classes/non-static classes with static members **would not** change. This is important for backwards compatibility   * The current behaviour of abstract classes/non-static classes with static members **would not** change. This is important for backwards compatibility
 +
 +
 +
  
 ===== Code ===== ===== Code =====
-  * http://lars.schokokeks.org/php/static-classes-001.diff+  * A few features missing, but initial functionality works: [[http://lars.schokokeks.org/php/static-classes-002.diff|static-classes-002.diff]]
  
 ===== Further reading ===== ===== Further reading =====
   * [[http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/79b3xss3(VS.80).aspx|Static classes in C#]]   * [[http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/79b3xss3(VS.80).aspx|Static classes in C#]]
rfc/static-classes.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1