rfc:spread_operator_for_array

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:spread_operator_for_array [2018/11/19 08:21] jhdxrrfc:spread_operator_for_array [2019/04/05 13:35] – more example jhdxr
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Spread Operator in Array Expression ====== ====== Spread Operator in Array Expression ======
-  * Version: 0.1+  * Version: 0.2
   * Date: 2018-10-13   * Date: 2018-10-13
   * Author: CHU Zhaowei, jhdxr@php.net   * Author: CHU Zhaowei, jhdxr@php.net
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 Spread operator works for both array syntax(''array()'') and short syntax(''[]''). Spread operator works for both array syntax(''array()'') and short syntax(''[]'').
 +
 +It's also possible to unpack array returned by a function immediately.
 +
 <code php> <code php>
 $arr1 = [1, 2, 3]; $arr1 = [1, 2, 3];
Line 27: Line 30:
 $arr3 = [0, ...$arr1]; //[0, 1, 2, 3] $arr3 = [0, ...$arr1]; //[0, 1, 2, 3]
 $arr4 = array(...$arr1, ...$arr2, 111); //[1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 111] $arr4 = array(...$arr1, ...$arr2, 111); //[1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 111]
-</code>+$arr5 = [...$arr1, ...$arr1]; //[1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3]
  
-==== String keys ==== +function getArr() { 
- +  return ['a', 'b'];
-It's possible to unpack arrays with string keys. When unpacking multiple arrays with same string key, the later value for that key will overwrite the previous one. +
- +
-For arrays with numeric keys, they will be renumbered with incrementing keys starting from zero. So if unpack multiple arrays with same numeric key, the later value will be appended instead of overwriting the previous one. +
- +
-It's possible to unpack arrays with mixed string and numeric keys. +
-<code php> +
-$arr1 = ['a' => 1, 'b' => 2, 'c'=> 3]; +
-$arr2 = [11 => 11, 22 => 22, 33 => 33]; +
-$arr3 = [111 => 9, 22 => 8, 'c' => 7]; +
-var_dump([...$arr1, ...$arr2]); +
-/* +
-array(6) { +
-  ["a"]=> +
-  int(1) +
-  ["b"]=> +
-  int(2) +
-  ["c"]=> +
-  int(3) +
-  [0]=> +
-  int(11) +
-  [1]=> +
-  int(22) +
-  [2]=> +
-  int(33)+
 } }
-*/ +$arr6 = [...getArr()'c']; //['a', 'b''c']
-var_dump([...$arr1...$arr3]); +
-/+
-array(5) {  +
-  ["a"]=>   +
-  int(1)    +
-  ["b"]=>   +
-  int(2)    +
-  ["c"]=>   +
-  int(7)    +
-  [0]=>     +
-  int(9)    +
-  [1]=>     +
-  int(8)    +
-}           +
-*/ +
-var_dump([...$arr2...$arr3]); +
-/* +
-array(6) { +
-  [0]=> +
-  int(11) +
-  [1]=> +
-  int(22) +
-  [2]=> +
-  int(33) +
-  [3]=> +
-  int(9) +
-  [4]=> +
-  int(8) +
-  ["c"]=> +
-  int(7) +
-+
-*/+
 </code> </code>
  
-Actually there are several ways to handle string keys in PHP now: 
-1. keep string keys 
-2. discard string keys, append the values only 
-3. raise warning / error for string keys 
  
-This RFC adopts option 1 for the following reasons. Since the spread operator here is an extension for array defination,and the array defination syntax allows array with string keys, option 3 has been ruled outPrior to this RFC, ''array_merge()'' does the similar job, and it's reasonable to follow the same behaviour in order to not confusing userland developers.+==== String keys ==== 
 + 
 +In order to make the behavior consistent with [[rfc:argument_unpacking|argument unpacking]], string keys are not supportedA recoverable error will be thrown once a string key is encountered.
  
 ==== By-reference passing ==== ==== By-reference passing ====
Line 102: Line 47:
 <code php> <code php>
 $arr1 = [1, 2, 3]; $arr1 = [1, 2, 3];
-$arr2 = [...&$arr1]; //invalid+$arr2 = [...&$arr1]; //invalid syntax
 </code> </code>
  
Line 125: Line 70:
 </code> </code>
  
 +===== Backward Incompatible Changes =====
 +This change should not break anything.
  
 +===== Q & A =====
 +==== Advantages over array_merge ====
 +  - Spread operator should have a better performance than ''array_merge''. It's becuase not only that spread operator is a language structure while ''array_merge'' is a function call, but also compile time optimiztion can be performaned for constant arrays.
 +  - ''array_merge'' only supports array, while spread operator also supportes objects implementing ''Traversable''.
 +<code php>
 +// Before
 +array_merge(iterator_to_array($iter1), iterator_to_array($iter2))
  
-===== Backward Incompatible Changes ===== +// Or to generalise to all iterables 
-This change should not break anything.+array_merge( is_array($iter1) ? $iter1 : iterator_to_array($iter1), 
 +is_array($iter2) ? $iter2 : iterator_to_array($iter2) ) 
 + 
 +// After (handles both cases) 
 +[ ...$iter1, ...$iter2 ] 
 + 
 +//Thanks Rowan for providing this example 
 +</code> 
 + 
 +==== ... should be preserved for other use (e.g. map concat) ==== 
 +This is kind of out of scope here to discuss other concat / merge operation. The important thing is we should make the behavior of same operator consistent and not to confuse userland developer. It's also why I changed the behavior for string keys in this revised version.
  
 ===== Proposed PHP Version(s) ===== ===== Proposed PHP Version(s) =====
rfc/spread_operator_for_array.txt · Last modified: 2019/05/13 12:45 by nikic