rfc:saner-numeric-strings
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
rfc:saner-numeric-strings [2020/07/17 12:16] theodorejb Fix typo |
rfc:saner-numeric-strings [2020/07/24 06:54] girgias Better credit to Andrea Faulds |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Version: 1.4 | * Version: 1.4 | ||
* Date: 2020-06-28 | * Date: 2020-06-28 | ||
+ | * Original Author: Andrea Faulds < | ||
+ | * Original RFC: [[http:// | ||
* Author: George Peter Banyard < | * Author: George Peter Banyard < | ||
- | * Status: | + | * Status: |
* First Published at: http:// | * First Published at: http:// | ||
* Implementation: | * Implementation: | ||
Line 226: | Line 228: | ||
* Warn on illegal offsets when used within < | * Warn on illegal offsets when used within < | ||
- | ===== Proposed Voting Choices | + | ===== Vote ===== |
- | Per the Voting RFC, there would be a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for the main proposal. A secondary Yes/No vote requiring a 50%+1 majority will decide whether float strings used as string offsets should continue to produce a warning (with different wording) instead of consistently becoming a TypeError. | + | Per the Voting RFC, there is a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for the main proposal. A secondary Yes/No vote requiring a 50%+1 majority will decide whether float strings used as string offsets should continue to produce a warning (with different wording) instead of consistently becoming a TypeError. |
Primary vote: | Primary vote: |
rfc/saner-numeric-strings.txt · Last modified: 2020/11/25 12:46 by girgias