rfc:saner-numeric-strings
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| rfc:saner-numeric-strings [2020/07/17 12:16] – Fix typo theodorejb | rfc:saner-numeric-strings [2020/07/17 15:10] – Update status theodorejb | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| * Date: 2020-06-28 | * Date: 2020-06-28 | ||
| * Author: George Peter Banyard < | * Author: George Peter Banyard < | ||
| - | * Status: | + | * Status: |
| * First Published at: http:// | * First Published at: http:// | ||
| * Implementation: | * Implementation: | ||
| Line 226: | Line 226: | ||
| * Warn on illegal offsets when used within < | * Warn on illegal offsets when used within < | ||
| - | ===== Proposed Voting Choices | + | ===== Vote ===== |
| - | Per the Voting RFC, there would be a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for the main proposal. A secondary Yes/No vote requiring a 50%+1 majority will decide whether float strings used as string offsets should continue to produce a warning (with different wording) instead of consistently becoming a TypeError. | + | Per the Voting RFC, there is a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for the main proposal. A secondary Yes/No vote requiring a 50%+1 majority will decide whether float strings used as string offsets should continue to produce a warning (with different wording) instead of consistently becoming a TypeError. |
| Primary vote: | Primary vote: | ||
rfc/saner-numeric-strings.txt · Last modified: 2020/11/25 12:46 by girgias