rfc:rfc.third-party-editing

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:rfc.third-party-editing [2016/05/13 01:41]
pollita Make recommendation for how to summarize arguments.
rfc:rfc.third-party-editing [2017/09/22 13:28] (current)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 If taken advantage of (and it would be optional to all parties), then not only does this provide a unified and consistent place to find established arguments during the voting phase, it ensures a historical record of the discussion in a more accessible format than searching mail archives. If taken advantage of (and it would be optional to all parties), then not only does this provide a unified and consistent place to find established arguments during the voting phase, it ensures a historical record of the discussion in a more accessible format than searching mail archives.
 +
 +Note that point 5 of https://​wiki.php.net/​rfc/​howto already calls for updating RFCs with arguments made on the list.  This proposal seeks to extend point 5:
 +
 +  * Codify how summaries be presented into a rough format
 +  * Update the default template to encourage RFC proponents to actually DO it.
 +  * Grant implicit permission for parties other than the RFC author to make a class of edits to an RFC without explicit permission
  
 ===== RFC Impact ===== ===== RFC Impact =====
rfc/rfc.third-party-editing.1463103665.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)