rfc:reflectiontypeimprovements

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:reflectiontypeimprovements [2016/06/15 17:08] levimrfc:reflectiontypeimprovements [2017/09/22 13:28] – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2016-06-10   * Date: 2016-06-10
   * Author: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>   * Author: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
-  * Status: Under Discussion+  * Status: Rejected
   * First Published at: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ReflectionTypeImprovements   * First Published at: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ReflectionTypeImprovements
  
Line 41: Line 41:
 It is unclear if voting requires 50%+1 or 2/3. On one hand this is not a language change but on the other this does contain a BC break. Rather than debating it one way or the other I've chosen to require 2/3. It is unclear if voting requires 50%+1 or 2/3. On one hand this is not a language change but on the other this does contain a BC break. Rather than debating it one way or the other I've chosen to require 2/3.
  
-The vote will be a simple yes or no for these changes.+The vote is a simple yes or no for these changes. Voting opened 2016-06-30 and will close 2016-07-08. 
 + 
 +<doodle title="Accept ReflectionType Improvements RFC?" auth="levim" voteType="single" closed="true"> 
 +   * Yes 
 +   * No 
 +</doodle>
  
 ===== Patches and Tests ===== ===== Patches and Tests =====
 The patch for this is not difficult; it will be coming soon. The patch for this is not difficult; it will be coming soon.
  
rfc/reflectiontypeimprovements.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/01 23:51 by carusogabriel