rfc:propertygetsetsyntax-alternative-typehinting-syntax

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:propertygetsetsyntax-alternative-typehinting-syntax [2013/01/21 17:58] – Start vote nikicrfc:propertygetsetsyntax-alternative-typehinting-syntax [2013/01/28 16:11] – Decline nikic
Line 2: Line 2:
   * Date: 2013-01-04   * Date: 2013-01-04
   * Author: Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>   * Author: Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>
-  * Status: Voting+  * Status: Declined
  
 ===== Introduction ===== ===== Introduction =====
Line 163: Line 163:
 This proposal depends on the main accessors RFC. The result of this vote is only relevant if the main RFC is accepted. As this is a language change it requires a 2/3 majority. This proposal depends on the main accessors RFC. The result of this vote is only relevant if the main RFC is accepted. As this is a language change it requires a 2/3 majority.
  
-<doodle title="Should the proposed typehinting syntax be used instead of the current one?" auth="nikic" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Should the proposed typehinting syntax be used instead of the current one?" auth="nikic" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
 </doodle> </doodle>
 +
 +The vote ended 3 in favor, 12 against, as such this feature is declined.
rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-alternative-typehinting-syntax.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1

Page Tools