Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- rfc:phpvcs [2008/11/13 11:21] – many questions about GIT techtonik
+++ rfc:phpvcs [2009/05/17 13:32] – updated status to "yes on svn", linked to svn.migration list, added progress category philip
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
   * **Date:** 2008-03-29
   * **Author:** Gwynne Raskind
-  * **Status:** In the works
+  * **Status:** Accepted
-  * **Votes:** (+0/-0)
+  * **Progress:** Roughly 90% implemented, see [[http://svn.php.net/]]
-    * **Pro:**
+  * **Votes:** While most people prefer a move to Git/Github, a more unanimous desire is required before such a large shift. We're sticking with the status quo and moving to SVN. A git bridge will exist.
-    * **Contra:**
 ==== Purpose ====
@@ Line 92: / Line 92: @@
 ==== Further Discussion And Reading ====
+[[http://news.php.net/svn.migration]]
 [[http://doc.php.net/php/rfc/rfc-proposal-show.php?id=8]]
 [[http://marc.info/?t=118036801200001&r=1&w=2|Better Changeset Tracking]]
-[[http://del.icio.us/sebastian_bergmann/scm]]
-[[http://blogs.gnome.org/newren/2007/11/17/adoption-of-various-vcses/]]
 [[http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-09-2007/jw-09-versioncontrol.html]] Maybe not the best article but a starting point, compares CVS, Subversion, Bazaar, Mercurial
@@ Line 110: / Line 108: @@
 [[http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/preed/2007/04/version_control_system_shootou_1.html]] Why mozilla chose mercurial
-[[http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/browse_thread/thread/7532d66890f63768]] Mozilla people discussing mercurial and git and others
+[[http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/browse_thread/thread/7532d66890f63768|Mozilla people discussing mercurial and git and others]]
 [[http://texagon.blogspot.com/2008/02/use-mercurial-you-git.html]] Another Mercurial vs. GIT
+[[http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0347/|Migrating the Python CVS to Subversion]] Rationale and procedure

Differences

Page Tools