rfc:peclversioning:solution1
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision |
| rfc:peclversioning:solution1 [2008/04/04 08:32] – sfox | rfc:peclversioning:solution1 [2008/04/04 09:55] – sfox |
|---|
| * In package.xml, the 'status' field for a release may be any of "dev", "alpha", "beta" or "stable". These states should be reflected in the version number: a "stable" release should be at least 1.0.0, for example. A Release Candidate is signified by RCx in the version number and a "beta" status in package.xml. | * In package.xml, the 'status' field for a release may be any of "dev", "alpha", "beta" or "stable". These states should be reflected in the version number: a "stable" release should be at least 1.0.0, for example. A Release Candidate is signified by RCx in the version number and a "beta" status in package.xml. |
| |
| If you feel that there should be further guidance, please support Pierre Joye's [[peclversioning/solution2|extended proposal]] which extends the remit of this one with in-depth guidelines for version numbering in new PECL extensions. | If you feel that there should be further guidance, please support Pierre Joye's [[/solution2|extended proposal]] which extends the remit of this one with in-depth guidelines for version numbering in new PECL extensions. |
| |
| === Core Modules in PECL === | === Core Modules in PECL === |
rfc/peclversioning/solution1.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1