rfc:password_registry

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:password_registry [2018/11/06 16:56] pollitarfc:password_registry [2018/11/20 19:02] – Close voting pollita
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2018-10-15   * Date: 2018-10-15
   * Author: Sara Golemon, pollita@php.net   * Author: Sara Golemon, pollita@php.net
-  * Status: Voting+  * Status: Accepted
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/password_registry   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/password_registry
  
Line 63: Line 63:
 ====== Minimizing impact to BC ====== ====== Minimizing impact to BC ======
  
-In order to minimize the impact of the above BC. we could overload the **password_hash()** and **password_needs_rehash()** methods to accept integer values 0, 1, 2, and 3 to function as aliases for DEFAULT, BCRYPT, ARGIN2I, and ARGON2ID, respectively.  This is being presented as a separate vote below.+In order to minimize the impact of the above BC. we could overload the **password_hash()** and **password_needs_rehash()** methods to accept integer values 0, 1, 2, and 3 to function as aliases for DEFAULT, BCRYPT, ARGIN2I, and ARGON2ID, respectively.   Using an int would therefore work, but would produce a deprecation warning.  This is being presented as a separate vote below.
  
 ===== Extension Changes ===== ===== Extension Changes =====
Line 78: Line 78:
 Simple 50% +1, make the password hashing system extensible via internal-only registry. Simple 50% +1, make the password hashing system extensible via internal-only registry.
  
-<doodle title="Make the password hashing system extensible via internal-only registry?" auth="pollita" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Make the password hashing system extensible via internal-only registry?" auth="pollita" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 86: Line 86:
 Should the above poll pass, the following 50%+1 question asks if we should additionally provide the overloaded behavior described above in "minimizing impact to BC". Should the above poll pass, the following 50%+1 question asks if we should additionally provide the overloaded behavior described above in "minimizing impact to BC".
  
-<doodle title="Support integer constants 0-3 to password_hash() et. al. for BC" auth="pollita" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Support integer constants 0-3 to password_hash() et. al. for BC" auth="pollita" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
rfc/password_registry.txt · Last modified: 2018/12/25 13:07 by cmb