rfc:p-plus-plus

This is an old revision of the document!


Poll: Feasibility of P++

Introduction

There are continuous arguments whether the PHP project should do everything to preserveproperly justify every backwards compatibility break, as well as continue to add new as well as change existing features to make PHP a more modern stricter language, with as an example enhanced stricter type-safety.

Several suggestions have been made to address this perceived split. One of them is creating a newly branded “P++” to put all the new strictness-related features into , and perhaps go the more “strict way”, while continuing to maintain “PHP” without making this original version change at all as dynamic as it is today. As it takes time, attention, and resources, to see whether such a direction is feasible, it makes sense to find out whether the general internals community thinks it is a worthwhile endeavour.

Proposal

The proposal in this RFC informal, non-binding vote is a simple poll to see whether “P++” (supporting two distinct languages dialects with different dynamic vs. strict handling) on top of a single, unified runtime is a direction that people want to commit to spending the project’s time and energy to explore at this time.

Vote

Feasibility of P++
Real name Yes No
ajf  
alcaeus  
beberlei  
brzuchal  
bukka  
bwoebi  
carusogabriel  
cschneid  
dams  
danack  
derick  
doubaokun  
duncan3dc  
galvao  
gasolwu  
girgias  
guilhermeblanco  
heiglandreas  
hywan  
jasny  
jedisct1  
jhdxr  
kalle  
kelunik  
kinncj  
krakjoe  
kriscraig  
malukenho  
marcio  
mariano  
mbeccati  
mcmic  
mike  
mikemike  
narf  
nikic  
ocramius  
pajoye  
patrickallaert  
peehaa  
pollita  
ramsey  
rasmus  
reywob  
rtheunissen  
salathe  
scorninpc  
sebastian  
sergey  
svpernova09  
tianfenghan  
trowski  
wjx  
wyrihaximus  
zeev  
zimt  
Count: 0 56
rfc/p-plus-plus.1565816351.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)