rfc:nullable_returns
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
rfc:nullable_returns [2016/04/14 14:51] – created fsb | rfc:nullable_returns [2016/04/14 15:38] – spelling fsb | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
===== Note to the reader ===== | ===== Note to the reader ===== | ||
- | The following arguments are based on opinion, experience and conversations. I tried to emphasize this by using first person | + | The following arguments are based on opinion, experience and conversations. I tried to emphasize this by using first person |
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== | ===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== | ||
- | We propose | + | We propose |
- | ===== Implementation ===== | + | - Nullable return (this RFC) |
+ | - [[https:// | ||
+ | - [[https:// | ||
+ | - none of the above | ||
- | I don't have the skills to do this myself. I failed to adapt [[Dmitry' | + | We propose to see what transpires in the discussion period before proposing voting choices. |
- | I expect that after a discussion on PHP interbals mailing list a choice can be made between 4 opions for 7.1: | ||
- | - Nullable return (this RFC) | + | ===== Implementation ===== |
- | - [Nullable type|https:// | + | |
- | - [[https:// | + | |
- | - None of 1, 2 or 3 | + | |
- | If nullable return is the choice for 7.1 then perhaps a volunteer can be found. Perhaps | + | I don't have the skills to do this myself. I failed to adapt [[Dmitry' |
rfc/nullable_returns.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1