rfc:null_coercion_consistency

This is an old revision of the document!


PHP RFC: NULL Coercion Consistency

Introduction

PHP 8.1 introduced Deprecate passing null to non-nullable arguments of internal functions. While the consistency introduced by the RFC is welcome (user-defined vs internal functions), for those not using strict_types=1, the partial breaking of NULL coercion creates an upgrade problem.

This RFC does not change anything for scripts using strict_types=1, as type checks are useful in that context. For example, developers who view NULL as a missing/invalid value (not as a value in itself), consider passing NULL to a function like htmlspecialchars() as something that indicates a problem for them.

Roughly 85% scripts do not use strict_types=1 (calculation below).

Roughly 33% of developers use static analysis (realistically it's less than this, details below).

There was a short discussion about the original RFC, but with the exception of Craig Duncan, there was no consideration for the problems this creates with existing code (or the inconsistency of NULL coercion compared to string/int/float/bool coercion).

The general direction of Unify PHP's typing modes by Girgias is correct, because automatic coercions like substr($string, “offset”) and htmlspecialchars(array()) are clearly problematic; but the following is common, and has been fine:

$search = filter_input(INPUT_GET, 'q'); // Or similar examples below.
 
echo 'Results for ' . htmlspecialchars($search);

Problem

Documentation

According to the documentation, when not using strict_types=1, “PHP will coerce values of the wrong type into the expected scalar type declaration if possible” (ref).

Coercion from NULL is well defined:

  1. To String: “null is always converted to an empty string.”
  2. To Integer: “null is always converted to zero (0).”
  3. To Float: “For values of other types, the conversion is performed by converting the value to int first and then to float”
  4. To Boolean: “When converting to bool, the following values are considered false [...] the special type NULL”

For example:

print('A');
print(1);
print(1.2);
print(false);
print(NULL); // Fine, coerced to empty string.
 
$o = [];
 
$o[] = ('' == '');
$o[] = ('' == NULL); // Fine, coerced to empty string.
 
$o[] = 'ConCat ' . 'A';
$o[] = 'ConCat ' . 123;
$o[] = 'ConCat ' . 1.2;
$o[] = 'ConCat ' . false;
$o[] = 'ConCat ' . NULL; // Fine, coerced to empty string.
 
$o[] = sprintf('%s', 'A');
$o[] = sprintf('%s', 1);
$o[] = sprintf('%s', 1.2);
$o[] = sprintf('%s', false);
$o[] = sprintf('%s', NULL); // Fine, coerced to empty string.
 
$o[] = htmlspecialchars('A');
$o[] = htmlspecialchars(1);
$o[] = htmlspecialchars(1.2);
$o[] = htmlspecialchars(false);
$o[] = htmlspecialchars(NULL); // Deprecated in 8.1, Fatal Error in 9.0?

With user-defined functions, while this does not cause a backwards compatibility issue (details below), it still highlights the coercion inconsistency, and that some type checking is happening in an environment that does not expect type checking:

function user_function(string $s, int $i, float $f, bool $b) {
  var_dump($s, $i, $f, $b);
}
 
user_function('1', '1', '1', '1');
  // string(1) "1" / int(1) / float(1) / bool(true)
 
user_function(2, 2, 2, 2);
  // string(1) "2" / int(2) / float(2) / bool(true)
 
user_function(3.3, 3.3, 3.3, 3.3);
  // string(3) "3.3" / int(3) / float(3.3) / bool(true)
 
user_function(false, false, false, false);
  // string(0) "" / int(0) / float(0) / bool(false)
 
user_function(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
  // Uncaught TypeError x4?

Arrays, Resources, and Objects (without __toString()) cannot be coerced (for fairly obvious reasons).

String/Int/Float/Bool can be coerced.

NULL can usually be coerced, but...

  1. PHP 7.0 introduced the ability for user-defined functions to specify parameter types via the Scalar Type Declarations RFC, where the focus was on strict_types=1. But the implementation also caused Type Errors when not using strict_types=1, which seems more of an over-sight, with coercion working for string/int/float/bool but not null (despite the documentation), and introducing a type check (for an environment that does not expect this).
  2. PHP 8.1 continued this inconsistency with internal functions.

Examples

Common sources of NULL:

$search = (isset($_GET['q']) ? $_GET['q'] : NULL);
 
$search = ($_GET['q'] ?? NULL); // Since PHP 7
 
$search = filter_input(INPUT_GET, 'q');
 
$search = $request->input('q'); // Laravel
$search = $request->get('q'); // Symfony
$search = $this->request->getQuery('q'); // CakePHP
$search = $request->getGet('q'); // CodeIgniter
 
$value = array_pop($empty_array);
$value = mysqli_fetch_row($result);
$value = json_decode($json); // Invalid JSON, or nesting limit.

Examples, often working with user input, where NULL has previously been fine:

$search_trimmed = trim($search);
 
$search_len = strlen($search);
 
$search_upper = strtoupper($search);
 
$search_hash = hash('sha256', $search);
 
echo htmlspecialchars($search);
 
echo 'https://example.com/?q=' . urlencode($search);
 
preg_match('/^[a-z]/', $search);
 
exec('/path/to/cmd ' . escapeshellarg($search));
 
socket_write($socket, $search);
 
xmlwriter_text($writer, $search);

And developers have used NULL to skip certain parameters, e.g.

setcookie('q', $search, NULL, NULL, NULL, true, true); // x4
 
substr($string, NULL, 3);
 
mail('nobody@example.com', 'subject', 'message', NULL, '-fwebmaster@example.com');

There are approximately 335 parameters affected by this deprecation.

As an aside, there are also roughly 104 questionable and 558 problematic parameters which probably shouldn't accept NULL or an Empty String. For these parameters, a different RFC could consider updating them to reject both NULL and Empty Strings, e.g. $needle in strpos(), and $characters in trim(); in the same way that $separator in explode() already has a “cannot be empty” Fatal Error.

Finding

The only realistic way for developers to find when NULL is passed to these internal functions is to use the deprecation notices (not ideal).

It is possible to use very strict Static Analysis, to follow every variable from source to sink (to check if a variable could be NULL), but most developers are not in a position to do this (i.e. not using static analysis, or not at a high enough level, or they are using a baseline to ignore).

In the last JetBrains developer survey, where 67% regularly used Laravel, only 33% used Static Analysis (source); where it's fair to say many still would not identify these possible NULL values.

As an example, take this simple script:

./src/index.php
<?php
$nullable = ($_GET['a'] ?? NULL);
echo htmlentities($nullable);
?>

It's considered fine today by the relevant tools:

composer require --dev vimeo/psalm
./vendor/bin/psalm --init ./src/ 4
./vendor/bin/psalm
No errors found!

Note: Psalm can detect this problem at levels 1, 2, and 3 (don't use a baseline).

composer require --dev phpstan/phpstan
./vendor/bin/phpstan analyse -l 9 ./src/
[OK] No errors
composer require --dev phpstan/phpstan-strict-rules
composer require --dev phpstan/extension-installer
./vendor/bin/phpstan analyse -l 9 ./src/
[OK] No errors

Note: There are Stricter Analysis options for PHPStan, but they don't seem to help with this problem.

composer require --dev rector/rector
./vendor/bin/rector init
./vendor/bin/rector process ./src/
[OK] Rector is done!
composer require --dev "squizlabs/php_codesniffer=*"
./vendor/bin/phpcs -p ./src/
E 1 / 1 (100%)
[...]
 2 | ERROR | Missing file doc comment
[...]
composer require friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer
./vendor/bin/php-cs-fixer fix src --diff --allow-risky=yes
Loaded config default.
Using cache file ".php-cs-fixer.cache".
   1) src/index.php
      ---------- begin diff ----------
--- src/index.php
+++ src/index.php
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 <?php
+
 $nullable = ($_GET['a'] ?? null);
 echo htmlentities($nullable);
-?>
\ No newline at end of file
 
      ----------- end diff -----------
 
Fixed all files in 0.012 seconds, 12.000 MB memory used
composer require --dev phpcompatibility/php-compatibility
sed -i '' -E 's/(PHPCSHelper::getConfigData)/(string) \1/g' vendor/phpcompatibility/php-compatibility/PHPCompatibility/Sniff.php
./vendor/bin/phpcs --config-set installed_paths vendor/phpcompatibility/php-compatibility
 
./vendor/bin/phpcs -p ./src/ --standard=PHPCompatibility --runtime-set testVersion 8.1
. 1 / 1 (100%)

Note: Juliette (@jrfnl) has confirmed that getting PHPCompatibility to solve this problem will be “pretty darn hard to do” because it's “not reliably sniffable” (source).

Temporary Solutions

You can disable E_DEPRECATED (as recommended by projects like WordPress).

Alternatively you can use set_error_handler(), with something like:

function ignore_null_coercion($errno, $errstr) {
  // https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/012ef7912a8a0bb7d11b2dc8d108cc859c51e8d7/Zend/zend_API.c#L458
  if ($errno === E_DEPRECATED && preg_match('/Passing null to parameter #.* of type .* is deprecated/', $errstr)) {
    return true;
  }
  return false;
}
set_error_handler('ignore_null_coercion', E_DEPRECATED);

And some developers are simply patching php-src (risky).

Updating

While making each change is fairly easy - they are difficult to find, there are many of them (time consuming), and the updates used are often pointless, e.g.

  • urlencode(strval($name));
  • urlencode((string) $name);
  • urlencode($name ?? “”);

One example diff didn't exactly make the code easier to read:

 - $result = substr($string, 0, $length);
 + $result = substr($string ?? '', 0, $length);

As noted above - PHPCompatibility, CodeSniffer, Rector, etc are unable to find or update these cases.

Proposal

No change for those using strict_types=1.

Must keep the spirit of the original RFC, and keep user-defined and internal functions consistent.

Revert the deprecation of NULL coercion when not using strict_types=1, to work as documented, be consistent with scalar types, and (most importantly) avoid the upgrade problems (i.e. Fatal Errors for PHP 9.0).

For consistency, change user-defined functions to allow NULL to be coerced when not using strict_types=1.

Backward Incompatible Changes

None

Proposed PHP Version(s)

PHP 8.2

RFC Impact

To SAPIs

None known

To Existing Extensions

None known

To Opcache

None known

Open Issues

“terrible idea” - I'm still waiting to hear details.

“it's a bit late” - We only have a deprecation at the moment (which can and is being ignored), it will be “too late” when PHP 9.0 uses Fatal Errors.

“Userland scalar types [...] did not include coercion from NULL for very good reasons.” - The only reason mentioned in Scalar Type Declarations is “to be consistent with our existing type declarations” (no further details given). Talking to developers, the only reason mentioned is noted above, where NULL can be viewed as a missing/invalid value, and passing NULL to a function like htmlspecialchars() could indicate a problem (while that might be useful in the context of strict_types=1, it hasn't been the case for everyone else).

Future Scope

Some function parameters could be updated to rase a Fatal Error when NULL or Empty String is provided; e.g.

  1. $needle in strpos()
  2. $characters in trim()
  3. $method in method_exists()
  4. $json in json_decode()

Voting

Accept the RFC

TODO

Implementation

TODO

Rejected Features

  1. Updating some parameters to accept NULL (details). This was rejected because some developers view NULL as a missing/invalid value that should never be passed to functions like htmlspecialchars() (quiz results).

Notes

The 85% of scripts that do not use strict_types=1 was calculated using grep.app, to “search across a half million git repos”, were each result is a script (not a count of matches, example). We can see 269,701 scripts using strict_types=1, out of 1,830,411. And keep in mind that WordPress only really appears once, it is affected by this deprecation, and is installed/used by many.

In the Scalar Type Declarations RFC for PHP 7.0, scalar types were defined as “int, float, string and bool” - but, despite NULL also being a simple value (i.e. not an array/object/resource), it was not included in this definition. For backwards compatibility reasons this definition is unlikely to change.

Also, note the example quote from Rasmus:

PHP is and should remain:
1) a pragmatic web-focused language
2) a loosely typed language
3) a language which caters to the skill-levels and platforms of a wide range of users
rfc/null_coercion_consistency.1650008069.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/04/15 07:34 by craigfrancis