rfc:namespaceref

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:namespaceref [2008/10/14 21:17] – stasrfc:namespaceref [2008/10/14 22:43] – stas
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Request for Comments: How to write RFCs ======+====== Namespace refinement proposals ======
   * Version: 1.0   * Version: 1.0
   * Date: 2008-03-06   * Date: 2008-03-06
Line 56: Line 56:
 ClassName->Foo - class constant access ClassName->Foo - class constant access
 </code> </code>
 +
 +==== Pro ====
 +  * The last syntax allows to call static methods unambiguously
 +  * Functions and constants supported
 +
 +==== Contra ====
 +  * The model is more complex and may be confusing for the new users.
 +  * Unqualified name resolutions for classes and functions/constants are slightly different due to the different usage patterns.
 +  * New syntax for static access
  
 ===== See also ===== ===== See also =====
rfc/namespaceref.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1

Page Tools