rfc:max_execution_wall_time

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:max_execution_wall_time [2020/12/21 18:48] kocsismaterfc:max_execution_wall_time [2020/12/21 19:35] (current) kocsismate
Line 9: Line 9:
 ===== Introduction ===== ===== Introduction =====
  
-On most platforms, PHP currently measures timeouts based on CPU time, rather than wall-clock time, so neither ''sleep()'', nor network or system calls count towards the limit of the ''max_execution_time'' ini setting. This behavior is not only surprising, but it can have serious consequences for distributed systems with high traffic, where finishing a request in a timely manner is essential for avoiding cascading failures.+On most platforms, PHP currently measures the request timeout based on CPU time, rather than wall-clock time, so neither ''sleep()'', nor network or system calls count towards the limit of the ''max_execution_time'' ini setting. This behavior is not only surprising, but it can have serious consequences for high traffic application, where terminating requests which take too long time to process is essential for avoiding cascading failures.
  
-Even if each individual network/system calls have their own timeouts, execution time can still horribly go out of control when there are hundreds or even thousands of such calls during the same request. This risk also applies to CLI scripts which can possibly execute millions of database queries or API requests.+Even if each individual network/system calls have their own timeout, execution time can still horribly go out of control when there are hundreds or even thousands of such calls during the same request. This risk also applies to CLI scripts which can possibly execute millions of database queries or API requests
 + 
 +Let's consider the following piece of code to better illustrate the problem: 
 + 
 +<PHP> 
 +<?php 
 + 
 +ini_set("max_execution_time", 10); 
 + 
 +$ch = curl_init(); 
 +curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, "http://example.com/index.php"); 
 +curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_TIMEOUT, 1); 
 + 
 +for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++) { 
 +    curl_exec($ch); 
 +
 +</PHP> 
 + 
 +Even though ''max_execution_time'' as well as ''CURLOPT_TIMEOUT'' are correctly set, this script can possibly run for ~100 seconds, given the cURL requests always time out. We can also run into the same problem while communicating through sockets, and not even setting the ''default_socket_timeout'' ini setting to a low value can help.
  
 To make things even worse, none of the most popular web servers offer a convenient solution. I.e. when using PHP-FPM as process manager, the ''request_terminate_timeout'' pool-level config option is available for stopping execution after a certain amount of time at latest. This can help, but it still falls short when there is a wide variety of acceptable timeout settings for the individual scripts. So in the end, one would have to maintain different pools for slow and fast scripts... Clearly, this can quickly become a burden. Not to mention the fact that neither shutdown handlers, nor the ''RSHUTDOWN'' internal function* is  invoked in case of a PHP-FPM timeout, so any extensions that do monitoring are rendered useless. To make things even worse, none of the most popular web servers offer a convenient solution. I.e. when using PHP-FPM as process manager, the ''request_terminate_timeout'' pool-level config option is available for stopping execution after a certain amount of time at latest. This can help, but it still falls short when there is a wide variety of acceptable timeout settings for the individual scripts. So in the end, one would have to maintain different pools for slow and fast scripts... Clearly, this can quickly become a burden. Not to mention the fact that neither shutdown handlers, nor the ''RSHUTDOWN'' internal function* is  invoked in case of a PHP-FPM timeout, so any extensions that do monitoring are rendered useless.
Line 29: Line 47:
 ===== Proposal ===== ===== Proposal =====
  
-This RFC proposes to add a ''max_execution_wall_time'' ini setting. If a script runs longer than the value of ''max_execution_wall_time'', measured in seconds according to wall-clock (or real) time, a fatal error is raised, similarly to what happens in case of "max_execution_time". By default, the value of the ini setting is ''0'', which means that the allowed script duration is unlimited.+This RFC proposes to add a ''max_execution_wall_time'' ini setting. If a script runs longer than the value of ''max_execution_wall_time'', measured in seconds according to wall-clock (or real) time, a fatal error is raised, similarly to what happens when exceeding "max_execution_time". By default, the value of the new ini setting is ''0'', which means that the allowed script duration is unlimited.
  
 A limitation of the implementation is that the timeout takes into effect on a best-effort basis, meaning that the fatal error is triggered only after the call exceeding the time limit is finished. This is in line with the current timeout behavior, and the RFC considers this as an acceptable limitation. A limitation of the implementation is that the timeout takes into effect on a best-effort basis, meaning that the fatal error is triggered only after the call exceeding the time limit is finished. This is in line with the current timeout behavior, and the RFC considers this as an acceptable limitation.
rfc/max_execution_wall_time.1608576504.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/12/21 18:48 by kocsismate