rfc:list_reference_assignment
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| rfc:list_reference_assignment [2017/01/04 16:05] – bp1222 | rfc:list_reference_assignment [2017/02/06 17:22] – bp1222 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| $a = $array[0]; | $a = $array[0]; | ||
| $b =& $array[1]; | $b =& $array[1]; | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <code php> | ||
| + | /* Note; []= syntax works the same, so the following is functionally equivalent to the example */ | ||
| + | [$a, &$b] = $array; | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 126: | Line 131: | ||
| ==== To Opcache ==== | ==== To Opcache ==== | ||
| Maybe, I don't know enough about opcache to say if changing current ops by adding an extended value would impact. | Maybe, I don't know enough about opcache to say if changing current ops by adding an extended value would impact. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Open Issues ===== | ||
| - | ==== Both Syntax ==== | ||
| - | The proposal follows the syntactic choice in allowing you to specify to each element in the list() which should be referenced into the target array. | ||
| - | <file php> | ||
| - | <?php | ||
| - | $array = [1, 2, 3]; | ||
| - | list($a, $b, $c) =& $array; | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | |||
| - | Which would be identical to proposed syntax: | ||
| - | <file php> | ||
| - | <?php | ||
| - | $array = [1, 2, 3]; | ||
| - | list(& | ||
| - | </ | ||
| ===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== | ===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== | ||
| Will require 2/3 | Will require 2/3 | ||
| + | <doodle title=" | ||
| + | * Yes | ||
| + | * No | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ===== Patches and Tests ===== | ===== Patches and Tests ===== | ||
rfc/list_reference_assignment.txt · Last modified: 2017/12/09 12:43 by nikic