rfc:iterator_chaining

This is an old revision of the document!


PHP RFC: Iterator chaining

Introduction

SPL provides a set of iterators that allow feeding one into another to create powerful data pipelines, however doing that is not particularly convenient:

$iterator = new RegexIterator($myIterator, '/some pattern/');
$iterator = new CallbackFilterIterator($iterator, fn(...) {...});
$iterator = new LimitIterator($iterator, 0, 123);
$iterator = new InfiniteIterator($iterator);

Phew, that's a lot of typing! Not easy to comprehend, either. Alternatively, a functional approach could be used:

$iterator = new InfiniteIterator(new LimitIterator(new CallbackFilterIterator(new RegexIterator($myIterator, '/some pattern/'), fn(...) {...}), 0, 123));

Note how the order of writing is gorgeously opposite to the order of data flow.

Proposal

Create a trait that extends iterators and allows to feed them into other iterators:

trait IteratorChain {
    public function skip(int $count): LimitIterator {}
    public function regexFilter(string $regex, int $mode = RegexIterator::MATCH, int $flags = 0 , int $preg_flags = 0): RegexIterator {}
    public function callbackFilter(callable $callback): CallbackIterator {}
    public function noRewind(): NoRewindIterator {}
    public function cached(int $flags = CachingIterator::CALL_TOSTRING): CachingIterator {}
    public function multiple(int $flags = MultipleIterator::MIT_NEED_ALL|MultipleIterator::MIT_KEYS_NUMERIC, string|int|null $info = null): MultipleIterator {}
    public function infinite(): InfiniteIterator {}
}

Use this trait in all SPL iterators, where appropriate. Full list:

  • ArrayIterator
  • DirectoryIterator
  • EmptyIterator - for uniformness
  • IteratorIterator and thus all its subclasses
  • MultipleIterator
  • RecursiveArrayIterator

Backward Incompatible Changes

What breaks, and what is the justification for it?

Proposed PHP Version(s)

8.1.

RFC Impact

Should not impact existing functionality (other than making some of it easier to use).

Open Issues

Need to

Unaffected PHP Functionality

List existing areas/features of PHP that will not be changed by the RFC.

This helps avoid any ambiguity, shows that you have thought deeply about the RFC's impact, and helps reduces mail list noise.

Future Scope

This section details areas where the feature might be improved in future, but that are not currently proposed in this RFC.

Proposed Voting Choices

Include these so readers know where you are heading and can discuss the proposed voting options.

Patches and Tests

Links to any external patches and tests go here.

If there is no patch, make it clear who will create a patch, or whether a volunteer to help with implementation is needed.

Make it clear if the patch is intended to be the final patch, or is just a prototype.

For changes affecting the core language, you should also provide a patch for the language specification.

Implementation

After the project is implemented, this section should contain

  1. the version(s) it was merged into
  2. a link to the git commit(s)
  3. a link to the PHP manual entry for the feature
  4. a link to the language specification section (if any)

References

Links to external references, discussions or RFCs

Rejected Features

Keep this updated with features that were discussed on the mail lists.

rfc/iterator_chaining.1616276066.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/03/20 21:34 by maxsem