rfc:instance_counter

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:instance_counter [2013/04/11 11:53] – [PHP RFC: instance counter] Version update frankrfc:instance_counter [2013/05/08 07:28] – [PHP RFC: instance counter] Declined frank
Line 5: Line 5:
   * Author: Frank Liepert, contact@frank-liepert.de   * Author: Frank Liepert, contact@frank-liepert.de
   * Contributor: Joe Watkins   * Contributor: Joe Watkins
-  * Status: Under Discussion+  * Status: Declined
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance_counter   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance_counter
  
Line 12: Line 12:
 Coming to Object-Orientated Programming, PHP offers a variety of possibilities to obtain information about classes and their instances (objects). In this regard, the classes/objects functions (http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.classobj.php) as well as the reflection API (http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.reflection.php) do a great job. But still there is no function to obtain a particular information: the number of instances of a class.  Coming to Object-Orientated Programming, PHP offers a variety of possibilities to obtain information about classes and their instances (objects). In this regard, the classes/objects functions (http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.classobj.php) as well as the reflection API (http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.reflection.php) do a great job. But still there is no function to obtain a particular information: the number of instances of a class. 
  
-One might say, simply implement a static counter in each class. But what about built-in classes like SPL? A wrapper would be required. Implementing it these ways, it does not only sound, but it actually is cumbersome. The purpose of this RFC is to address this issue.+One might say, simply implement a static counter in each class. But what about built-in classes like SPL? A wrapper would be required. Implementing it these ways, it not only sounds, but actually is cumbersome. The purpose of this RFC is to address this issue.
  
 ===== Proposal ===== ===== Proposal =====
Line 18: Line 18:
 The proposal is to add a new functionality dealing with the number of instances of either a specific class name/object or set of class names/objects or all classes. The proposal is to add a new functionality dealing with the number of instances of either a specific class name/object or set of class names/objects or all classes.
  
-The function name should fit in with the current names of class/object functions. Therefore, the name **get_objects_count()** seems to be reasonable, but is still up for discussion (see [[#Function name]]).+The function name should fit in with the current names of class/object functions. Therefore, the name **get_objects_count()** seems to be reasonable.
  
   * **If no argument is provided, the number of all objects in the object store as an associative array ('class name' => count) will be returned.**   * **If no argument is provided, the number of all objects in the object store as an associative array ('class name' => count) will be returned.**
Line 149: Line 149:
 ===== Function name ===== ===== Function name =====
  
-Further suggestions for the function name in example #1:+Since there were no objections against the proposed function name, its status changes to accepted.
 <code> <code>
-// Proposed+// Proposed + Accepted
 get_objects_count() get_objects_count()
  
Line 188: Line 188:
 ===== Open Issues ===== ===== Open Issues =====
  
-  * Decision on function name. +None.
 ===== Patches and Tests ===== ===== Patches and Tests =====
  
Line 205: Line 204:
  
 - None. - None.
 +
 +===== Vote =====
 +<doodle title="Should this RFC be implemented?" auth="frank" voteType="single" closed="true">
 +   * Yes
 +   * No
 +</doodle>
 +    
 +==== Voting period ====
 +Start: **2013/04/30**
 +
 +End: **2013/05/07**
rfc/instance_counter.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1