rfc:fiber

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:fiber [2018/04/18 22:55]
lvht
rfc:fiber [2018/06/12 07:40] (current)
krakjoe move back to discussion
Line 128: Line 128:
  
 Both Ruby's Fiber and Lua's coroutine using the same **resume()** API to **init** and **resume** their coroutine. Both Ruby's Fiber and Lua's coroutine using the same **resume()** API to **init** and **resume** their coroutine.
- 
-<blockquote>Why not introduce keyword like async/await?</blockquote> 
- 
-Introducing new keywords will cause BC impact. Both Ruby's Fiber and Lua's coroutine does not have such keyword as well. 
  
 ===== Unaffected PHP Functionality ===== ===== Unaffected PHP Functionality =====
Line 137: Line 133:
  
 ===== Future Scope ===== ===== Future Scope =====
-This sections details areas where the feature might be improved in future, but that are not currently proposed in this RFC. 
  
-===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== +Syntax like async/await can be implemented in the future, but it's out of the scope of this RFC.
-2/3+1 voting majority+
  
 ===== Patches and Tests ===== ===== Patches and Tests =====
rfc/fiber.1524092111.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/04/18 22:55 by lvht