rfc:explicit_octal_notation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Last revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| rfc:explicit_octal_notation [2020/11/13 13:23] – changed to "In Voting" and removed "Proposed" from "Voting Choices" tiffany | rfc:explicit_octal_notation [2020/11/25 12:21] – Close vote girgias | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| * Date: 2020-10-20 | * Date: 2020-10-20 | ||
| * Author: George Peter Banyard, < | * Author: George Peter Banyard, < | ||
| - | * Status: | + | * Status: |
| * First Published at: https:// | * First Published at: https:// | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| Per the Voting RFC, there is a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for this proposal to be accepted. | Per the Voting RFC, there is a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for this proposal to be accepted. | ||
| - | <doodle title=" | + | <doodle title=" |
| * Yes | * Yes | ||
| * No | * No | ||
rfc/explicit_octal_notation.txt · Last modified: 2021/01/04 20:12 by girgias