rfc:explicit_octal_notation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:explicit_octal_notation [2020/11/07 08:52] – Add a new filter flag in future scope section. girgiasrfc:explicit_octal_notation [2020/11/11 12:24] – Open vote girgias
Line 68: Line 68:
 Per the Voting RFC, there is a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for this proposal to be accepted. Per the Voting RFC, there is a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for this proposal to be accepted.
  
-<doodle title="Add support for explicit octal notation" auth="girgias" voteType="single" closed="true">+<doodle title="Add support for explicit octal notation" auth="girgias" voteType="single" closed="false">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
rfc/explicit_octal_notation.txt · Last modified: 2021/01/04 20:12 by girgias