rfc:explicit_octal_notation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
rfc:explicit_octal_notation [2020/11/07 08:50] – Flesh out section about numeric strings. girgias | rfc:explicit_octal_notation [2020/11/11 12:24] – Open vote girgias | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
* Deprecate the implicit octal notation. | * Deprecate the implicit octal notation. | ||
* Support hexadecimal, | * Support hexadecimal, | ||
+ | * Add a flag for the < | ||
===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== | ===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== | ||
Line 67: | Line 68: | ||
Per the Voting RFC, there is a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for this proposal to be accepted. | Per the Voting RFC, there is a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for this proposal to be accepted. | ||
- | <doodle title=" | + | <doodle title=" |
* Yes | * Yes | ||
* No | * No |
rfc/explicit_octal_notation.txt · Last modified: 2021/01/04 20:12 by girgias