rfc:escaping_operator

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
rfc:escaping_operator [2016/08/06 02:03] – michael-vostrikovrfc:escaping_operator [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2016-07-14   * Date: 2016-07-14
   * Author: Michael Vostrikov <michael.vostrikov@gmail.com>   * Author: Michael Vostrikov <michael.vostrikov@gmail.com>
-  * Status: Voting+  * Status: Declined
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator
  
Line 334: Line 334:
  
 Will this short tag / operator be useful for many people with the functionality described above? Will this short tag / operator be useful for many people with the functionality described above?
-<doodle title="Add new operator (short tag) for context-dependent escaping to next PHP 7.x?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Add new operator (short tag) for context-dependent escaping to next PHP 7.x?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 342: Line 342:
 Additional questions. Voting is not required if you have voted 'No' in the first vote. Additional questions. Voting is not required if you have voted 'No' in the first vote.
 \\  \\ 
-<doodle title="Is default handler required, with a possibility to fully unregister it?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Is default handler required, with a possibility to fully unregister it?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 348: Line 348:
 \\  \\ 
  
-<doodle title="Is it needed to wrap the functions into static class?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Is it needed to wrap the functions into static class?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 354: Line 354:
 \\  \\ 
  
-<doodle title="Is the comma suitable as a separation sign?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Is the comma suitable as a separation sign?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
rfc/escaping_operator.1470449004.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)

Page Tools