rfc:escaping_operator

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
rfc:escaping_operator [2016/07/30 14:58] – michael-vostrikovrfc:escaping_operator [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== PHP RFC: New operator (tag) for context-dependent escaping ======+====== PHP RFC: New operator (short tag) for context-dependent escaping ======
   * Version: 1.0   * Version: 1.0
   * Date: 2016-07-14   * Date: 2016-07-14
   * Author: Michael Vostrikov <michael.vostrikov@gmail.com>   * Author: Michael Vostrikov <michael.vostrikov@gmail.com>
-  * Status: Voting+  * Status: Declined
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator
  
Line 331: Line 331:
  
 Requires a 2/3 majority\\ Requires a 2/3 majority\\
 +Voting is open till August 6.\\ 
  
-Will this tag/operator be useful for many people with the functionality described above? +Will this short tag / operator be useful for many people with the functionality described above? 
-<doodle title="Could it be implemented in PHP?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Add new operator (short tag) for context-dependent escaping to next PHP 7.x?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 341: Line 342:
 Additional questions. Voting is not required if you have voted 'No' in the first vote. Additional questions. Voting is not required if you have voted 'No' in the first vote.
 \\  \\ 
-<doodle title="Is default handler required, with a possibility to fully unregister it?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Is default handler required, with a possibility to fully unregister it?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 347: Line 348:
 \\  \\ 
  
-<doodle title="Is it needed to wrap the functions into static class?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Is it needed to wrap the functions into static class?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 353: Line 354:
 \\  \\ 
  
-<doodle title="Is the comma suitable as a separation sign?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Is the comma suitable as a separation sign?" auth="michael-vostrikov" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
Line 360: Line 361:
  
 ===== Patches and Tests ===== ===== Patches and Tests =====
 +
 Diff with changes:\\ Diff with changes:\\
 https://github.com/michael-vostrikov/php-src/commit/ca149a3dfea71f529eb1647f2d0ed2b8d63e279d https://github.com/michael-vostrikov/php-src/commit/ca149a3dfea71f529eb1647f2d0ed2b8d63e279d
rfc/escaping_operator.1469890697.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)

Page Tools