rfc:enhanced_error_handling

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:enhanced_error_handling [2010/01/10 16:18] – kampfcasparrfc:enhanced_error_handling [2012/08/03 18:23] – I'm pretty sure that those extension-s should be exception-s. tyrael
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Request for Comments: Enhanced Error Handling ====== ====== Request for Comments: Enhanced Error Handling ======
-  * Version: 0.4 +  * Version: 0.5 
-  * Date:    2010-01-07+  * Date:    2010-01-10
   * Author:  Hans-Peter Oeri <hp@oeri.ch>   * Author:  Hans-Peter Oeri <hp@oeri.ch>
   * Status:  Drafting   * Status:  Drafting
Line 8: Line 8:
 ===== Introduction ===== ===== Introduction =====
  
-php_error(), zend_throw_extension(), the @-operator... PHP and/or the Zend Engine respectively offer a variety of error issuance and handling mechanisms. There is, however, no encompassing concepts: Core functions only issue php_errors (suppressable), intl 1.0.3 by default suppresses all errors but can activate php_errors, pdo however has a flag to define error behaviour that allows exceptions - but limits php_error to E_WARNING. Furthermore, each extension has a different way of changing its error behaviour etc. etc.+php_error(), zend_throw_exception(), the @-operator... PHP and/or the Zend Engine respectively offer a variety of error issuance and handling mechanisms. There is, however, no encompassing concepts: Core functions only issue php_errors (suppressable), intl 1.0.3 by default suppresses all errors but can activate php_errors, pdo however has a flag to define error behaviour that allows exceptions - but limits php_error to E_WARNING. Furthermore, each extension has a different way of changing its error behaviour etc. etc.
  
 I think that error behaviour has to be in the hands of the user (php coder). Different users have different preferences - and prefer different behaviour in different situations. I think that error behaviour has to be in the hands of the user (php coder). Different users have different preferences - and prefer different behaviour in different situations.
Line 93: Line 93:
 A lower hierarchy level could enforce the use of a specific exception class, e.g. PersonalIntlExceptionClass() for all of intl.so. While forcing such a common class does ease catching, some information a more specific class could provide is lost. A lower hierarchy level could enforce the use of a specific exception class, e.g. PersonalIntlExceptionClass() for all of intl.so. While forcing such a common class does ease catching, some information a more specific class could provide is lost.
  
-As of PHP 5.3, the concept of exception chaining has been introduced, whereas a "previous" extension can be attached. In order to keep the previously lost information, the concrete exception class given upon issuing an error should be chained to the enforced class.+As of PHP 5.3, the concept of exception chaining has been introduced, whereas a "previous" exception can be attached. In order to keep the previously lost information, the concrete exception class given upon issuing an error should be chained to the enforced class.
  
 ==== Notices ==== ==== Notices ====
rfc/enhanced_error_handling.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1

Page Tools