rfc:empty_isset_exprs

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:empty_isset_exprs [2012/05/21 20:35] – [Vote] lstrojnyrfc:empty_isset_exprs [2012/05/24 21:06] – Mark as implemented nikic
Line 2: Line 2:
   * Date: 2012-04-12   * Date: 2012-04-12
   * Author: Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>   * Author: Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>
-  * Status: In voting phase+  * Status: Implemented
   * Original discussion: http://markmail.org/thread/gnci76ugtwda2t42 (Apr 10, 2012 3:53 pm)   * Original discussion: http://markmail.org/thread/gnci76ugtwda2t42 (Apr 10, 2012 3:53 pm)
   * RFC announcement: http://markmail.org/thread/ju2jyrenxkeddrnt (Apr 12, 2012 2:42 pm)   * RFC announcement: http://markmail.org/thread/ju2jyrenxkeddrnt (Apr 12, 2012 2:42 pm)
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 <doodle  <doodle 
-title="Which of the language constructs should accept arbitrary arguments?" auth="nikic" voteType="single" closed="False">+title="Which of the language constructs should accept arbitrary arguments?" auth="nikic" voteType="single" closed="True">
    * Both empty() and isset()    * Both empty() and isset()
    * Only empty()    * Only empty()
Line 66: Line 66:
    * no    * no
 </doodle> </doodle>
 +
 +==== Result ====
 +
 +The RFC was accepted with the option "Only empty()". The relevant commit it https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/ec061a93c53c8cde10237741e98e992c1a05d148.
rfc/empty_isset_exprs.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1

Page Tools