rfc:empty_isset_exprs
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
rfc:empty_isset_exprs [2012/04/30 12:49] – Change vote nikic | rfc:empty_isset_exprs [2012/05/21 20:36] – [Vote] lstrojny | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
The patch is available as a PR on Github: https:// | The patch is available as a PR on Github: https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Change only empty()? ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | After further discussion it seems like it might be better to only add expression support for '' | ||
+ | original RFC included '' | ||
+ | |||
+ | On the other hand, using '' | ||
+ | is semantically unclear (how can '' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Allowing '' | ||
==== Vote ==== | ==== Vote ==== | ||
< | < | ||
- | title=" | + | title=" |
* Both empty() and isset() | * Both empty() and isset() | ||
* Only empty() | * Only empty() |
rfc/empty_isset_exprs.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1