rfc:empty_isset_exprs

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:empty_isset_exprs [2012/04/18 23:06] – Move to voting nikicrfc:empty_isset_exprs [2012/04/19 10:06] nikic
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 As for function calls (and other expressions) it is already known that the value exists, using ''empty()''/''isset()'' is As for function calls (and other expressions) it is already known that the value exists, using ''empty()''/''isset()'' is
-not necessary and ''!func()''/''func() !== null'' can be used instead instead.+not necessary and ''!func()''/''func() !== null'' can be used instead.
  
 ==== Why should we change the behavior? ==== ==== Why should we change the behavior? ====
rfc/empty_isset_exprs.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1