rfc:dnf_types

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:dnf_types [2022/06/17 15:17] – Open vote girgiasrfc:dnf_types [2022/07/02 13:12] – update "Vote" heading imsop
Line 63: Line 63:
  
 <code> <code>
-(A&B)|(C&D|(Y&D)|null+(A&B)|(C&D)|(Y&D)|null
 (B&A)|null|(D&Y)|(C&D) (B&A)|null|(D&Y)|(C&D)
 null|(C&D)|(B&A)|(Y&D) null|(C&D)|(B&A)|(Y&D)
Line 188: Line 188:
 8.2 8.2
  
-===== Proposed Voting Choices =====+===== Vote =====
  
 As per the voting RFC a yes/no vote with a 2/3 majority is needed for this proposal to be accepted. As per the voting RFC a yes/no vote with a 2/3 majority is needed for this proposal to be accepted.
rfc/dnf_types.txt · Last modified: 2023/01/21 22:12 by girgias