rfc:arrayof
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
rfc:arrayof [2014/01/17 11:43] – krakjoe | rfc:arrayof [2014/02/27 21:00] – philstu | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== PHP RFC: Array Of ====== | ====== PHP RFC: Array Of ====== | ||
- | * Version: 0.1.1 | + | * Version: 0.1.2 |
* Date: 2014-01-15 | * Date: 2014-01-15 | ||
* Author: Joe Watkins, krakjoe@php.net & Phil Sturgeon philstu@php.net | * Author: Joe Watkins, krakjoe@php.net & Phil Sturgeon philstu@php.net | ||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
Logic here would dictate that if you ask for a bag of spanners, you get a bag of spanners, not a bag with a few spanners and maybe a few "I owe you one spanner" | Logic here would dictate that if you ask for a bag of spanners, you get a bag of spanners, not a bag with a few spanners and maybe a few "I owe you one spanner" | ||
- | 2. Should multi-dimensional hints be allowed? | + | ===== Closed Questions ===== |
+ | |||
+ | 1. Should multi-dimensional hints be allowed? | ||
<code php> | <code php> | ||
Line 154: | Line 156: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | This suggests | + | The general consensus seemed to be that instead of using " |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 2. RFC suggested syntax, or Hack Generics syntax? | ||
+ | |||
+ | With this features close proximity to the " | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Java has both features, with their own syntax. This means there is no reason for us to hold off implementing with the existing syntax and looking | ||
+ | |||
+ | If people want to change the syntax of this feature more in line with Hack generics syntax then simply vote no, and we can revisit the issue. | ||
- | One example provided has been " | ||
===== Backward Incompatible Changes ===== | ===== Backward Incompatible Changes ===== |
rfc/arrayof.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1