rfc:allow_null

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:allow_null [2022/02/07 16:55] – Add link to implementation craigfrancisrfc:allow_null [2022/02/20 20:19] – Possible options craigfrancis
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== PHP RFC: Allow NULL ====== ====== PHP RFC: Allow NULL ======
  
-  * Version: 1.1+  * Version: 1.3
   * Voting Start: ?   * Voting Start: ?
   * Voting End: ?   * Voting End: ?
   * RFC Started: 2021-12-23   * RFC Started: 2021-12-23
-  * RFC Updated: 2021-12-31+  * RFC Updated: 2022-02-20
   * Author: Craig Francis, craig#at#craigfrancis.co.uk   * Author: Craig Francis, craig#at#craigfrancis.co.uk
   * Status: Draft   * Status: Draft
Line 16: Line 16:
 PHP 8.1 introduced "Deprecate passing null to non-nullable arguments of internal functions" ([[https://externals.io/message/112327|short discussion]]), which is making it difficult (time consuming) for developers to upgrade. PHP 8.1 introduced "Deprecate passing null to non-nullable arguments of internal functions" ([[https://externals.io/message/112327|short discussion]]), which is making it difficult (time consuming) for developers to upgrade.
  
-Often //NULL// is used for undefined //GET/////POST/////COOKIE// variables:+This has introduced an inconstancy when not using //strict_types=1//, because most variables types (e.g. integers) can be coerced to the relevant type, but //NULL// has been deprecated. 
 + 
 +In PHP //NULL// is often used to represent something; e.g. when a //GET/////POST/////COOKIE// variable is undefined:
  
 <code php> <code php>
Line 35: Line 37:
   * //json_decode()//   * //json_decode()//
  
-Which makes it common for //NULL// to be passed to internal functions, e.g.+This makes it common for //NULL// to be passed to many internal functions, e.g.
  
 <code php> <code php>
Line 50: Line 52:
 </code> </code>
  
-Another example is when PHP provides //NULL// for undefined variables, e.g.+Developers also use //NULL// to skip certain parameters, e.g. //$additional_headers// in //mail()//.
  
-<code php> +Where //NULL// has always been coerced into an empty string, the integer 0, the boolean false, etc.
-locale_accept_from_http($_SERVER['HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE']); +
-</code>+
  
-Or when developers explicitly use //NULL// to skip certain parameters, e.g. //$additional_headers// in //mail()//.+Currently the deprecation notices only affect those using PHP 8.1 with //E_DEPRECATED//, but it implies everyone will need to modify their code to avoid **Fatal Errors** in PHP 9.0.
  
-Currently this only affects those using PHP 8.1 with //E_DEPRECATED//, but it implies everyone will need to modify their code in the future - presumably this will be a **fatal error** in PHP 9.0, with a //TypeError// exception?+Developers using //strict_types=1// may find some value in this, but it's excessive and inconstant for everyone else.
  
-This also applies to those developers not using //strict_types=1//which is excessive.+And while individual changes are easy, there are many of them (time consuming), difficult to find, and often pointlesse.g.
  
-And while the individual changes are easy - there are many of them, they are difficult to find, and often pointless (e.g. //urlencode(strval($name))//).+  * urlencode(strval($name))
 +  * urlencode((string) $name); 
 +  * urlencode($name ?? '');
  
-Without the changes below, developers will need to either - use these deprecation notices, or use very strict Static Analysis (one that can determine when a variable can be //NULL//; e.g. Psalm at [[https://psalm.dev/docs/running_psalm/error_levels/|level 3]], with no baseline).+To find these issues, developers need to either - use these deprecation notices, or use very strict Static Analysis (one that can determine when a variable can be //NULL//; e.g. Psalm at [[https://psalm.dev/docs/running_psalm/error_levels/|level 3]], with no baseline).
  
-===== Proposal =====+It's worth noting that some parameters, like //$separator// in //explode()//, already have a "cannot be empty" Fatal Error. So it might be useful to have a separate RFC to update some of these parameters to consistently reject NULL **or** Empty Strings, e.g. //$needle// in //strpos()// and //$json// in //json_decode()//.
  
-Update **some** internal function parameters to accept (be tolerant to) //NULL//.+===== Proposal =====
  
-This needs to be done before the eventual end of the deprecation period, and //TypeError// exceptions are thrown, which would create an unnecessary burden for developers to upgrade.+There are 3 possible approaches:
  
-While this is in Draftthe [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md|list of functions are hosted on GitHub]].+  - NULL triggers a Fatal Error with strict_types=1otherwise allow coercion (like how integers can be coerced to a string). 
 +  NULL triggers a Fatal Error for everyone, but update some parameters to explicitly allow NULL (e.g. //?string//). 
 +  - NULL triggers a Fatal Error for everyone (forget about backwards compatibility).
  
-Only the parameters in **bold** would be changed.+This needs to be done before the eventual end of the deprecation period, and //TypeError// exceptions are thrown.
  
-Suggestions and pull requests welcome.+If we choose to "update some parameters to explicitly allow NULL", there is a [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md|draft list of functions]], where the **bold** are being proposed (currently only includes string parameters). [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/issues|Suggestions]] and [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/pulls|Pull Requests]] welcome.
  
-There is also a [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-maybe.md|Maybe List]], where the more questionable arguments end with a "!". For example, //strrpos()// accepting an empty string for //$needle// is wired in itself, and //sodium_crypto_box_open()// should never receive a blank //$ciphertext//.+There is also a [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-maybe.md|Maybe List]], where the more questionable arguments end with a "!". For example, //strrpos()// accepting an empty string for //$needle// is wired in itself, and //sodium_crypto_box_open()// should never receive a blank //$ciphertext//. And there is an [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-other.md|Other List]], which can be ignored.
  
 ===== Decision Process ===== ===== Decision Process =====
  
-Does the parameter work with //NULL//, in the same way it would with an empty string? e.g.+Does //NULL// for this parameter justify a Fatal Error? e.g.
  
   - //preg_match()// should **deprecate** //NULL// for //$pattern// ("empty regular expression" warning).   - //preg_match()// should **deprecate** //NULL// for //$pattern// ("empty regular expression" warning).
Line 119: Line 123:
 ===== Future Scope ===== ===== Future Scope =====
  
-Some functions parameters could be updated to complain when an Empty String or //NULL// is provided.+Some function parameters could be updated to complain when an //NULL// **or** //Empty String// is provided; e.g. //$method// in //method_exists()//, or //$characters// in //trim()//.
  
 ===== Voting ===== ===== Voting =====
Line 127: Line 131:
 TODO TODO
  
-===== Patches and Tests =====+===== Tests =====
  
 To get and **Test** the list of functions, I wrote a script to //get_defined_functions()//, then used //ReflectionFunction()// to identify parameters that accepted the 'string' type, and not //->allowsNull()//. This resulted in the [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md|list of functions to change]], where I manually removed the [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-other.md|functions that shouldn't be changed]], and updated the script to test every argument (to see that it complained with //NULL//, and the output remained the same) - [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions.php|Source]]. To get and **Test** the list of functions, I wrote a script to //get_defined_functions()//, then used //ReflectionFunction()// to identify parameters that accepted the 'string' type, and not //->allowsNull()//. This resulted in the [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md|list of functions to change]], where I manually removed the [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-other.md|functions that shouldn't be changed]], and updated the script to test every argument (to see that it complained with //NULL//, and the output remained the same) - [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions.php|Source]].
Line 135: Line 139:
 https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-src/compare/master...allow-null https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-src/compare/master...allow-null
  
-This patch currently defines //Z_PARAM_STR_ALLOW_NULL//.+This patch defines //Z_PARAM_STR_ALLOW_NULL//.
  
 It works a bit like //Z_PARAM_STR_OR_NULL//, but it will return an empty string instead of //NULL//. It works a bit like //Z_PARAM_STR_OR_NULL//, but it will return an empty string instead of //NULL//.
  
-It's a fairly easy drop in replacement for //Z_PARAM_STR//, which is used by functions like [[https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/7b90ebeb3f954123915f6d62fb7b2cd3fdf3c6ec/ext/standard/html.c#L1324|htmlspecialchars()]].+It's a fairly easy drop in replacement for //Z_PARAM_STR//, e.g. [[https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/7b90ebeb3f954123915f6d62fb7b2cd3fdf3c6ec/ext/standard/html.c#L1324|htmlspecialchars()]].
  
 ===== Rejected Features ===== ===== Rejected Features =====
rfc/allow_null.txt · Last modified: 2022/04/05 17:49 by craigfrancis