rfc:allow_null

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:allow_null [2021/12/30 02:59] – Draft updates craigfrancisrfc:allow_null [2022/02/20 20:19] – Possible options craigfrancis
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== PHP RFC: Allow NULL ====== ====== PHP RFC: Allow NULL ======
  
-  * Version: 1.0+  * Version: 1.3
   * Voting Start: ?   * Voting Start: ?
   * Voting End: ?   * Voting End: ?
   * RFC Started: 2021-12-23   * RFC Started: 2021-12-23
-  * RFC Updated: 2021-12-23+  * RFC Updated: 2022-02-20
   * Author: Craig Francis, craig#at#craigfrancis.co.uk   * Author: Craig Francis, craig#at#craigfrancis.co.uk
   * Status: Draft   * Status: Draft
Line 14: Line 14:
 ===== Introduction ===== ===== Introduction =====
  
-PHP 8.1 introduced "Deprecate passing null to non-nullable arguments of internal functions" ([[https://externals.io/message/112327|short discussion]]), which is making it difficult for developers to upgrade.+PHP 8.1 introduced "Deprecate passing null to non-nullable arguments of internal functions" ([[https://externals.io/message/112327|short discussion]]), which is making it difficult (time consuming) for developers to upgrade.
  
-Often //NULL// is used for undefined //GET/////POST/////COOKIE// variables:+This has introduced an inconstancy when not using //strict_types=1//, because most variables types (e.g. integers) can be coerced to the relevant type, but //NULL// has been deprecated. 
 + 
 +In PHP //NULL// is often used to represent something; e.g. when a //GET/////POST/////COOKIE// variable is undefined:
  
 <code php> <code php>
Line 27: Line 29:
 </code> </code>
  
-And //NULL// can be returned from many functions, e.g.+And //NULL// can be returned from functions, e.g.
  
   * //array_pop()//   * //array_pop()//
Line 35: Line 37:
   * //json_decode()//   * //json_decode()//
  
-Which makes it common for developers to pass potential //NULL// values to these internal functions, e.g.+This makes it common for //NULL// to be passed to many internal functions, e.g.
  
 <code php> <code php>
Line 50: Line 52:
 </code> </code>
  
-Currently this affects those using PHP 8.1 with //E_DEPRECATED//, but it implies everyone will need to modify their code in the future.+Developers also use //NULL// to skip certain parameters, e.g. //$additional_headers// in //mail()//.
  
-It also applies even if they are not using //strict_types=1//.+Where //NULL// has always been coerced into an empty string, the integer 0, the boolean false, etc.
  
-And while the individual modifications are easy, there are many of them, they are difficult to find, and often pointless (e.g. //urlencode(strval($name))//).+Currently the deprecation notices only affect those using PHP 8.1 with //E_DEPRECATED//, but it implies everyone will need to modify their code to avoid **Fatal Errors** in PHP 9.0.
  
-Without the changes listed below, developers will need to either use these deprecation warnings, or use strict Static Analysis (one that can determine when a variable can be //NULL//; e.g. Psalm at [[https://psalm.dev/docs/running_psalm/error_levels/|level 3]], with no baseline).+Developers using //strict_types=1// may find some value in this, but it's excessive and inconstant for everyone else. 
 + 
 +And while individual changes are easy, there are many of them (time consuming), difficult to find, and often pointless, e.g. 
 + 
 +  * urlencode(strval($name)); 
 +  * urlencode((string) $name); 
 +  * urlencode($name ?? ''); 
 + 
 +To find these issues, developers need to either use these deprecation notices, or use very strict Static Analysis (one that can determine when a variable can be //NULL//; e.g. Psalm at [[https://psalm.dev/docs/running_psalm/error_levels/|level 3]], with no baseline)
 + 
 +It's worth noting that some parameters, like //$separator// in //explode()//, already have a "cannot be empty" Fatal Error. So it might be useful to have a separate RFC to update some of these parameters to consistently reject NULL **or** Empty Strings, e.g. //$needle// in //strpos()// and //$json// in //json_decode()//.
  
 ===== Proposal ===== ===== Proposal =====
  
-Update **some** internal function parameters to accept NULL, to reduce the burden for developers upgrading.+There are 3 possible approaches:
  
-While this is in Draftthe [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md|list of functions is hosted on GitHub]] (pull requests welcome):+  - NULL triggers a Fatal Error with strict_types=1otherwise allow coercion (like how integers can be coerced to a string). 
 +  NULL triggers a Fatal Error for everyone, but update some parameters to explicitly allow NULL (e.g. //?string//). 
 +  - NULL triggers a Fatal Error for everyone (forget about backwards compatibility).
  
-===== Decision Process =====+This needs to be done before the eventual end of the deprecation period, and //TypeError// exceptions are thrown.
  
-Does the parameter work with //NULL//, in the same way that it would if an empty string is provided? e.g.+If we choose to "update some parameters to explicitly allow NULL", there is a [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md|draft list of functions]]where the **bold** are being proposed (currently only includes string parameters)[[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/issues|Suggestions]] and [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/pulls|Pull Requests]] welcome.
  
-  - //preg_match()// should continue to deprecate //NULL// for //$pattern//, whereas //$subject// should accept //NULL//. +There is also a [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-maybe.md|Maybe List]]where the more questionable arguments end with a "!"For example, //strrpos()// accepting an empty string for //$needle// is wired in itself, and //sodium_crypto_box_open()// should never receive a blank //$ciphertext//. And there is an [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-other.md|Other List]], which can be ignored.
-  - //hash_file()// should continue to deprecate //NULL// for the //$filename//+
-  - //hash()// should accept //NULL// for //$data//. +
-  - //substr_count()// requires a non-empty string //$needle// (continue to deprecate //NULL//). +
-  - //mb_convert_encoding()// requires a valid encoding for //$to_encoding// (continue to deprecate //NULL//).+
  
-You could argue some function parameters should not accept an empty string either (e.g. //strpos()// accepting an empty string for //$needle//), but that would require different RFCs, where backwards compatibility would need to be discussed.+===== Decision Process ===== 
 + 
 +Does //NULL// for this parameter justify a Fatal Error? e.g. 
 + 
 +  - //preg_match()// should **deprecate** //NULL// for //$pattern// ("empty regular expression" warning). 
 +  - //preg_match()// should **accept** //NULL// for //$subject// (e.g. checking user input). 
 +  - //hash_file()// should **deprecate** //NULL// for the //$filename//
 +  - //hash()// should **accept** //NULL// for //$data//
 +  - //substr_count()// should **deprecate** //NULL// for //$needle// ("$needle cannot be empty" error). 
 +  - //mb_convert_encoding()// should **deprecate** //NULL// for //$to_encoding// (requires a valid encoding).
  
 ===== Backward Incompatible Changes ===== ===== Backward Incompatible Changes =====
Line 100: Line 119:
 ===== Open Issues ===== ===== Open Issues =====
  
-TODO+Is the [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md|list of functions]] complete?
  
 ===== Future Scope ===== ===== Future Scope =====
  
-None+Some function parameters could be updated to complain when an //NULL// **or** //Empty String// is provided; e.g. //$method// in //method_exists()//, or //$characters// in //trim()//.
  
 ===== Voting ===== ===== Voting =====
Line 112: Line 131:
 TODO TODO
  
-===== Patches and Tests =====+===== Tests =====
  
-TODO+To get and **Test** the list of functions, I wrote a script to //get_defined_functions()//, then used //ReflectionFunction()// to identify parameters that accepted the 'string' type, and not //->allowsNull()//. This resulted in the [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md|list of functions to change]], where I manually removed the [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-other.md|functions that shouldn't be changed]], and updated the script to test every argument (to see that it complained with //NULL//, and the output remained the same) - [[https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions.php|Source]].
  
 ===== Implementation ===== ===== Implementation =====
  
-TODO+https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-src/compare/master...allow-null 
 + 
 +This patch defines //Z_PARAM_STR_ALLOW_NULL//
 + 
 +It works a bit like //Z_PARAM_STR_OR_NULL//, but it will return an empty string instead of //NULL//. 
 + 
 +It's a fairly easy drop in replacement for //Z_PARAM_STR//, e.g. [[https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/7b90ebeb3f954123915f6d62fb7b2cd3fdf3c6ec/ext/standard/html.c#L1324|htmlspecialchars()]].
  
 ===== Rejected Features ===== ===== Rejected Features =====
rfc/allow_null.txt · Last modified: 2022/04/05 17:49 by craigfrancis