rfc:abolish-narrow-margins

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:abolish-narrow-margins [2019/02/07 06:04]
krakjoe
rfc:abolish-narrow-margins [2019/02/22 11:45] (current)
krakjoe accepted
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2016-11-17   * Date: 2016-11-17
   * Author: krakjoe   * Author: krakjoe
-  * Status: Under Discussion+  * Status: Accepted
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/abolish-narrow-margins   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/abolish-narrow-margins
  
Line 16: Line 16:
 RFC's come in the following two categories: RFC's come in the following two categories:
  
-  * Proposals to amend or create policy documents 
   * Proposals to make changes to PHP   * Proposals to make changes to PHP
 +  * Proposals to amend or create policy documents
  
-This RFC proposes that //all// RFC's need to meet the same high standard.Votes that would result in changes to PHP or the amendment or creation of policy documentation must require a super majority of 2/3.+This RFC proposes that **all** RFC's need to meet the same high standard: The main acceptance vote of any RFC must require a super majority of 2/3.
  
 If this RFC is accepted, the original [[rfc:voting|voting RFC]] will be amended as per the Normative Text section of this RFC. If this RFC is accepted, the original [[rfc:voting|voting RFC]] will be amended as per the Normative Text section of this RFC.
Line 48: Line 48:
  
 A straight yes/no vote, 2/3 super majority required to pass. A straight yes/no vote, 2/3 super majority required to pass.
 +
 +<doodle title="Adopt the changes in this proposal?" auth="krakjoe" voteType="single" closed="true">
 +   * Yes
 +   * No
 +</doodle>
 +
 +Voting started on Friday 8th February, finishes Friday 22nd February.
  
 ===== Discussion Topics ====== ===== Discussion Topics ======
  
-  * Suggestion that we should raise standard even higher (75%): rejected on the grounds that the bar is high enough at 2/3, we don't want less contributions, we want clearer outcomes.+  * Suggestion that we should raise standard even higher (75%): rejected on the grounds that the bar is high enough at 2/3, we don't want fewer contributions, we want clearer outcomes.
   * Suggestion that we should introduce quorum: this is not the topic of this RFC.   * Suggestion that we should introduce quorum: this is not the topic of this RFC.
   * Suggestion that we should change who can vote: this is not the topic of this RFC.   * Suggestion that we should change who can vote: this is not the topic of this RFC.
rfc/abolish-narrow-margins.1549519488.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/02/07 06:04 by krakjoe