rfc:abolish-narrow-margins
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
rfc:abolish-narrow-margins [2019/02/06 17:21] – krakjoe | rfc:abolish-narrow-margins [2019/02/22 11:45] (current) – accepted krakjoe | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Date: 2016-11-17 | * Date: 2016-11-17 | ||
* Author: krakjoe | * Author: krakjoe | ||
- | * Status: | + | * Status: |
* First Published at: http:// | * First Published at: http:// | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
RFC's come in the following two categories: | RFC's come in the following two categories: | ||
- | * Proposals to amend or create policy documents | ||
* Proposals to make changes to PHP | * Proposals to make changes to PHP | ||
+ | * Proposals to amend or create policy documents | ||
- | This RFC proposes that //all// RFC's need to meet the same high standard.: Any vote that would result in changes to PHP, or amend or create policy documentation | + | This RFC proposes that **all** RFC's need to meet the same high standard: |
- | This change means that the main vote in any RFC must have a super majority. | + | If this RFC is accepted, |
- | + | ||
- | Subsidiary votes come in the following two categories: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - Vote to resolve implementation details - ie. Choose between version X and version Y of an implementation for a main vote. | + | |
- | - Vote that could have been run as a separate | + | |
- | + | ||
- | A subsidiary vote of type 1 may require a slim majority (as per the current definition). | + | |
- | + | ||
- | A subsidiary vote of type 2 must require a super majority (as per the current definition). | + | |
- | + | ||
- | These new rules are unambiguous, | + | |
These rules shall apply to any RFC whose vote ends after this RFC is accepted, should this RFC be accepted. | These rules shall apply to any RFC whose vote ends after this RFC is accepted, should this RFC be accepted. | ||
- | ==== Normative | + | ==== Normative |
- | + | ||
- | If this RFC is accepted, the original [[rfc: | + | |
Under the " | Under the " | ||
Line 61: | Line 48: | ||
A straight yes/no vote, 2/3 super majority required to pass. | A straight yes/no vote, 2/3 super majority required to pass. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <doodle title=" | ||
+ | * Yes | ||
+ | * No | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Voting started on Friday 8th February, finishes Friday 22nd February. | ||
===== Discussion Topics ====== | ===== Discussion Topics ====== | ||
- | * Suggestion that we should raise standard even higher (75%): rejected on the grounds that the bar is high enough at 2/3, we don't want less contributions, | + | * Suggestion that we should raise standard even higher (75%): rejected on the grounds that the bar is high enough at 2/3, we don't want fewer contributions, |
* Suggestion that we should introduce quorum: this is not the topic of this RFC. | * Suggestion that we should introduce quorum: this is not the topic of this RFC. | ||
* Suggestion that we should change who can vote: this is not the topic of this RFC. | * Suggestion that we should change who can vote: this is not the topic of this RFC. |
rfc/abolish-narrow-margins.1549473717.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/02/06 17:21 by krakjoe