The primitives any()
and all()
are a common part of many programming languages and help in avoiding verbosity or unnecessary abstractions.
For example, the following code could be shortened significantly:
// The old version $satisifies_predicate = false; foreach ($item_list as $item) { // Performs DB operations or external service requests, stops on first match by design. if (API::satisfiesCondition($item)) { $satisfies_predicate = true; break; } } if (!$satisfies_predicate) { throw new APIException("No matches found"); } // more code....
// The new version is much shorter, readable, and easier to review, // without creating temporary variables or helper functions that are used in only one place. // Performs DB operations or external service requests, stops on first match by design. if (!\PHP\iterable\any($item_list, fn($item) => API::satisfiesCondition($item))) { throw new APIException("No matches found"); }
Add the functions PHP\iterable\any(iterable $input, ?callable $callback = null): bool
and all(...)
to PHP's standard library's function set.
(The namespace PHP\iterable
was preferred in a straw poll that was previously sent out)
The implementation is equivalent to the following polyfill:
namespace PHP\iterable; /** * Determines whether any element of the iterable satisfies the predicate. * * * If the value returned by the callback is truthy * (e.g. true, non-zero number, non-empty array, truthy object, etc.), * this is treated as satisfying the predicate. * * @param iterable $input * @param null|callable(mixed):mixed $callback */ function any(iterable $input, ?callable $callback = null): bool { foreach ($input as $v) { if ($callback !== null ? $callback($v) : $v) { return true; } } return false; }
/** * Determines whether all elements of the iterable satisfy the predicate. * * If the value returned by the callback is truthy * (e.g. true, non-zero number, non-empty array, truthy object, etc.), * this is treated as satisfying the predicate. * * @param iterable $input * @param null|callable(mixed):mixed $callback */ function all(iterable $input, ?callable $callback = null): bool { foreach ($input as $v) { if (!($callback !== null ? $callback($v) : $v)) { return false; } } return true; }
This proposal recommends adding PHP\iterable\any()
and PHP\iterable\all()
to the standard library instead of a PECL or composer library for the following reasons
any()
and all()
if those functions were reimplemented in various composer libraries or util.php files with different semantics/names and only occasionally used.
When any()
or all()
are called with an iterable and a predicate, it internally checks if the value returned by the predicate is truthy (e.g. true, non-zero numbers, non-empty arrays, truthy objects, etc.)
When any()
or all()
are called with only an iterable, it is equivalent to checking if any/all of the arguments are truthy. This is equivalent to calling any()
/all()
with fn ($x) => $x
, which is equivalent to calling it with fn($x) => (bool)$x
.
php > var_export(PHP\iterable\any([false])); false php > var_export(PHP\iterable\any([true])); true php > var_export(PHP\iterable\any([0])); false php > var_export(PHP\iterable\any([1])); true php > var_export(PHP\iterable\any([0], fn($x) => $x)); false php > var_export(PHP\iterable\any([1], fn($x) => $x)); true php > var_export(PHP\iterable\all([true, true, true], fn($x) => $x)); true php > var_export(PHP\iterable\all([1, 2, 3], fn($x) => $x)); true php > var_export(PHP\iterable\all([true, true, false], fn($x) => $x)); false php > var_export(PHP\iterable\all([1, 2, 0], fn($x) => $x)); false php > var_export(PHP\iterable\all([1, 2, 0]); false
A secondary vote will be held on whether to name this any()
/all()
or any_value()
/all_values()
PHP is unique in that the primitive array-like type array
type is also a dictionary, making the keys often significant (strings, numeric identifiers, etc).
Existing function names vary in whether the fact that they only act on values is explicitly included in the name.
Many other programming languages have gone with a short name for the default of checking if a value is in a collection.
The primitives
any()
andall()
are a common part of many programming languages and help in avoiding verbosity or unnecessary abstractions.
Benefits of a shorter name:
array_reduce()
, array_unique()
, in_array()
, next()
that use values for their underlying implementation (i.e. not being named array_reduce_values()
, next_value()
, etc.)ARRAY_FILTER_USE_KEY
/ARRAY_FILTER_USE_BOTH
without adding more global functionsBenefits of a longer name:
any_key()
/(any_entry
or any_key_value
) instead of using $flags (which will be simpler to statically analyze or infer types for - in rare cases the argument $flags passed to array_filter($values, $callback, $flags)
is an unknown dynamic value). flags: PHP\iterable\USE_KEY
may make the code longer. any()
for values of iterables doesn't prevent PHP from adding any_key()
for checking keys of iterables in the future, either (my personal preference would be to add any_key()
regardless of whether any()
/any_value()
was added).
Any userland functions called PHP\iterable\any()
and PHP\iterable\all()
in the global namespace without a !function_exists()
check would encounter duplicate function errors.
Because the PHP namespace is reserved for internal use by PHP, this is unlikely.
8.1
Similar to array_filter, int $flag = 0
could be used to control which parameters get passed to the predicate such as ARRAY_FILTER_USE_BOTH
and ARRAY_FILTER_USE_KEY
.
Because there was discussion of whether the ability to pass keys was widely useful and multiple approaches that could be used to pass the iterable key, this functionality was left out of this RFC. See https://externals.io/message/111711#111721
I like this, but I do not like the flags. I don't think they're at all useful. A lot of the other discussion in the thread seems to be needlessly complicating it, too.
all() and any() only need return booleans. Their callbacks only need return booleans. That's the point. first() makes sense to add, and it would return the first value that matches.
For the callback itself, there is work to, hopefully, add partial function application to 8.1. (No idea if it will be successful, but the effort is in progress.) If so, the upshot is that turning an arbitrary function into a single-parameter function becomes silly easy, which means functions like this can just expect a single parameter callback and be done with it. No need for extra-args or flags or whatnot.
If you want to check the keys of an array, call
array_keys()
first and use that.
if (any(array_keys($foo), fn($k) => $k %2)) { ... }
all(), any(), and first() all sound like good things to include, but let's not over-complicate them. We can do better today than we could in 1999...
--Larry Garfield
https://externals.io/message/111711#111732
If it took the default value as well it could return that (to distinguish the absence of a result from null matching the predicate). While it's useful in itself it also would enable you to pass a marker object and check the identity of that to know if no matches have been found:
$none = new stdClass; $element = first($collection, fn($elt) => ..., $none); if ($element === $none) { // nothing found }
Calling it [iterable_]search_callback()
or first_match[ing]()
or find()
might help distinguish this from the reset()
/end()
/next()
/prev()
family of global functions - there's more than one possible name.
any_value()
or all_values()
have been suggested as alternative names: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/6053#issuecomment-684164832
I suggest slightly different signatures, assuming we stay value-oriented:
// ...omitted // with named parameters all_values(of: [1, 3, 5, 7], satisfy: 'is_odd'); any_value(of: [0, 2, 4, 6], satisfies: 'is_prime'); // without named parameters all_values([1, 3, 5, 7], 'is_odd'); any_value([0, 2, 4, 6], 'is_prime');The naming clarifies what any and all are about--the values--and leaves room for naming functions that are key or key/value oriented.
iter_any()
or iterable_any()
have also been suggested as alternative names.
The main thing I'm concerned about is that once we start extending this area (I assume that any & all are not going to be the last additions in this space) we will quickly run into function names that are either too generic or outright collide. For example, what if we want to add an iterator-based version of range()? Do we really want to be forced to pull a Python and call it xrange()? That's about as good as real_range()...
As such, I think it's important to prefix these somehow, though I don't care strongly how. Could be iter_all() or iterable_all(). We might even make it iterator_all() if we also adjust other existing iterator_* functions to accept iterables. I'd also be happy with iter\all() or iterable\all(), but that gets us back into namespacing discussions :)
Because any()
and all()
are potentially commonly used functions in the same way as count(Countable|array)
and always return booleans, I preferred a short name over longer names.
This also allows potentially supporting int $flags = 0
in the future, similar to what was done for array_filter()
.
Initially, the proposal was to add this in the global scope as iterable_all()
and iterable_any()
.
I was actually working on this sort of thing recently. Technically, you can support all, any, and first by using a single function:
function find_first(iterable $of, callable($value, $key): bool $thatSatistifes): IteratorIt converts the
$iterable
into anIterator
, then calls the callback for each key/value pair until one returns true, and then always returns the iterator at the current position.This allows you to know both key and value when making a decision. By returning an iterator the caller can get both key and value. By returning an iterator it can handle both the empty case and not found cases with
$result->valid() === false
. By returning an iterator it might be useful for processing the remainder of the list somehow. I'm not sure that in practice it would be that friendly, but it's worth pointing out for discussion at least.
Add PHP\iterable\any(iterable $input, ?callable $callback = null): bool
and PHP\iterable\all(iterable $input, ?callable $callback = null): bool
(yes/no, requiring a 2/3 majority)
Voting started on 2021-02-08 and ended on 2021-02-22.
The following secondary vote will be used to decide between any()
/all()
and any_value()
/all_values()
as the name within the PHP\iterable
namespace. See the discussion section for the benefits/drawbacks of those names.
Adding flags like ''array_filter()'' was left out of this RFC due to debate over how often it would be used in practice and moved to future scope.
PHP\iterable\all
and PHP\iterable\any
, add a secondary vote on any/all
vs any_value()/all_values()