rfc:tls-peer-verification
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
rfc:tls-peer-verification [2013/12/18 03:53] – [Proposal] added missing word rdlowrey | rfc:tls-peer-verification [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Date: 2013-10-15 | * Date: 2013-10-15 | ||
* Author: Daniel Lowrey, rdlowrey@gmail.com | * Author: Daniel Lowrey, rdlowrey@gmail.com | ||
- | * Status: | + | * Status: |
* First Published at: http:// | * First Published at: http:// | ||
* Major Revision (v0.1 -> v0.2): 2013-12-17 | * Major Revision (v0.1 -> v0.2): 2013-12-17 | ||
Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
* Should secure-by-default client peer verification be implemented for 5.6? | * Should secure-by-default client peer verification be implemented for 5.6? | ||
- | * If secure-by-default verification is implemented, | ||
- | ===== Patches and Tests ===== | + | ===== Implementation |
- | + | ||
- | The patch linked below is intended as final (subject to any changes instigated during the RFC process): | + | |
* https:// | * https:// | ||
- | * (update 2013-12-17) https:// | ||
- | ===== Implementation ===== | ||
- | |||
- | TBD | ||
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
Line 198: | Line 191: | ||
Voting closes Dec. 31 ... happy holidays! | Voting closes Dec. 31 ... happy holidays! | ||
- | <doodle title=" | + | <doodle title=" |
* Yes | * Yes | ||
* No | * No |
rfc/tls-peer-verification.1387338819.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)