rfc:skipparams
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| rfc:skipparams [2015/02/08 08:10] – stas | rfc:skipparams [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| * Date: 2015-01-01 | * Date: 2015-01-01 | ||
| * Author: Stas Malyshev < | * Author: Stas Malyshev < | ||
| - | * Status: | + | * Status: |
| * Implementation: | * Implementation: | ||
| ===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
| * This RFC does not prevent named parameters implementation - in fact, a lot of cleanup to the code mentioned above is also necessary for named parameters implementation, | * This RFC does not prevent named parameters implementation - in fact, a lot of cleanup to the code mentioned above is also necessary for named parameters implementation, | ||
| - | ==== Vote ==== | + | ===== Vote ===== |
| Since this RFC changes the language semantics, the 2/3+1 vote majority is required for it to pass. The vote is a straight Yes/No vote. | Since this RFC changes the language semantics, the 2/3+1 vote majority is required for it to pass. The vote is a straight Yes/No vote. | ||
| - | <doodle title=" | + | <doodle title=" |
| * Yes | * Yes | ||
| * No | * No | ||
rfc/skipparams.1423383011.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)